OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between brachial blood pressure, and transfer function-estimated and invasively measured central aortic pressure in patients with at least moderate symptomatic aortic stenosis. METHODS: Fourteen patients aged 54-81 years with mean (SD) effective valve area of 0.69 (0.20) cm2, undergoing coronary angiography, had simultaneous peripheral and central aortic blood pressure measurements. Brachial blood pressure was determined by an oscillometric method. Aortic pressure was measured directly using pressure transducer tipped catheters, and estimated indirectly by the application of a transfer function to a radial arterial waveform obtained by tonometry. RESULTS: Measured aortic systolic pressure did not differ significantly from brachial pressure [mean difference (SD) 2 (9) mmHg, P = not significant (NS)]. Transfer function estimates of central systolic pressure obtained from the radial waveform calibrated from brachial pressure were less accurate [mean difference -8 (7) mmHg, P = 0.001]. Recalibration of the radial waveforms using the invasive mean and diastolic blood pressure improved the agreement [mean difference -2 (6) mmHg, P = NS] but did not provide a better estimate than brachial blood pressure. The accuracy of noninvasively estimated subendocardial viability ratio was substantially improved by recalibration of radial arterial waveforms using corrected ejection time. CONCLUSION: In patients with aortic stenosis there is clinically acceptable agreement between noninvasive brachial pressure and directly measured central aortic pressure.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between brachial blood pressure, and transfer function-estimated and invasively measured central aortic pressure in patients with at least moderate symptomatic aortic stenosis. METHODS: Fourteen patients aged 54-81 years with mean (SD) effective valve area of 0.69 (0.20) cm2, undergoing coronary angiography, had simultaneous peripheral and central aortic blood pressure measurements. Brachial blood pressure was determined by an oscillometric method. Aortic pressure was measured directly using pressure transducer tipped catheters, and estimated indirectly by the application of a transfer function to a radial arterial waveform obtained by tonometry. RESULTS: Measured aortic systolic pressure did not differ significantly from brachial pressure [mean difference (SD) 2 (9) mmHg, P = not significant (NS)]. Transfer function estimates of central systolic pressure obtained from the radial waveform calibrated from brachial pressure were less accurate [mean difference -8 (7) mmHg, P = 0.001]. Recalibration of the radial waveforms using the invasive mean and diastolic blood pressure improved the agreement [mean difference -2 (6) mmHg, P = NS] but did not provide a better estimate than brachial blood pressure. The accuracy of noninvasively estimated subendocardial viability ratio was substantially improved by recalibration of radial arterial waveforms using corrected ejection time. CONCLUSION: In patients with aortic stenosis there is clinically acceptable agreement between noninvasive brachial pressure and directly measured central aortic pressure.
Authors: Jose M De la Torre Hernández; Gabriela Veiga Fernandez; Jonathan Brown; Fermin Sainz Laso; Dae-Hyun Lee; Victor Fradejas; Tamara Garcia Camarero; Sammy Elmariah; Ignacio Inglessis; Javier Zueco; Jose A Vazquez de Prada; Eyal Ben-Assa; Elazer R Edelman Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2021-05-04 Impact factor: 3.738
Authors: Chloe M Park; Olga Korolkova; Justin E Davies; Kim H Parker; Jennifer H Siggers; Katherine March; Therese Tillin; Nish Chaturvedi; Alun D Hughes Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 4.844