Literature DB >> 1900636

An analysis of the retrolabyrinthine vs. the retrosigmoid vestibular nerve section.

M E Glasscock1, B A Thedinger, R A Cueva, C G Jackson.   

Abstract

Vestibular neurectomy is gaining widespread acceptance as a primary means of controlling medically refractory vertigo. However, debate continues over the adequacy of vestibular neurectomy within the cerebellopontine angle, long-term control, and the most appropriate surgical approach. To address these issues, we retrospectively reviewed 118 patients who underwent vestibular neurectomy between October 1984 and January 1988. Forty-two patients who underwent a retrolabyrinthine approach and 44 patients who underwent a retrosigmoid approach completed a written questionnaire and provided a recent audiogram. According to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines, complete or substantial vertigo control was achieved and maintained in 95% of patients in both surgical groups. Hearing, tinnitus, and fullness results over the long term are variable. The advantages and disadvantages of the various vestibular neurectomy approaches will be detailed. On review of our results and surgical experience, we now prefer the retrosigmoid approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1900636     DOI: 10.1177/019459989110400116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  3 in total

Review 1.  Tinnitus.

Authors:  A Sismanis
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Technical modifications of suboccipital craniectomy for prevention of postoperative headache.

Authors:  Damon A Silverman; Gordon B Hughes; Sam E Kinney; Joung H Lee
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2004-05

3.  Transtemporal supralabyrinthine (middle cranial fossa) vestibular neurectomy: a review of the last 100 cases.

Authors:  U Fisch
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1996
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.