Literature DB >> 19006259

The off-versus on-label use of medical devices in interventional cardiovascular medicine?: Clarifying the ambiguity between regulatory labeling and clinical decision making, part III: structural heart disease interventions.

Ralf Holzer1, Ziyad Hijazi.   

Abstract

The majority of devices used to treat congenital cardiac lesions in the cardiac catheterization laboratory are used on an off-label basis. This article discusses the predicaments faced by the interventional cardiologist when implanting devices on an off-label basis, using procedural examples of PFO closure and endovascular stent placement. Strategies that may benefit patient and provider, as well as satisfying regulatory agencies are suggested. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19006259     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

Review 1.  Patent foramen ovale closure and medical treatments for secondary stroke prevention: a systematic review of observational and randomized evidence.

Authors:  Georgios D Kitsios; Issa J Dahabreh; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; David E Thaler; David M Kent
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Identifying Gaps in Technology for Congenital Interventions: Analysis of a Needs Survey from Congenital Interventional Cardiologists.

Authors:  Kamel Shibbani; Damien Kenny; Doff McElhinney; Ziyad M Hijazi; Tim Moran
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Outcomes Associated with the Off-label Use of Medical Devices in Congenital Heart Disease at a Single Institute.

Authors:  Young Hwa Kong; Jinyoung Song; Jun Huh; I-Seok Kang
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.243

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.