Literature DB >> 19005721

Results of an observational study in carotid surgery using absorbable suture material.

Marko Aleksic1, Jan Uedelhoven, Vladimir Matoussevitch, Thomas Luebke, Salvatore Tomagra, Barbara Krug, Jan Brunkwall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Absorbable sutures are not well accepted for reconstruction in high-pressure arterial segments because the suture line might break and aneurysmal changes could develop. This hypothesis was checked in the clinical setting of carotid surgery.
METHODS: The morphology of the carotid artery was evaluated by color-coded ultrasound in four groups of patients: group A, 25 patients who underwent standard carotid endarterectomy and patchplasty, including a transverse plication for which absorbable sutures had been used; group B, 10 patients who underwent eversion endarterectomy and reinsertion using absorbable sutures; group C, 15 patients who underwent standard carotid endarterectomy and patchplasty without a transverse placation; group D, 20 patients who suffered from atherosclerotic disease but did not have previous carotid surgery or other carotid pathology. All operations had been performed at least 3 years earlier than the actual examination.
RESULTS: Along the internal carotid artery, where an aneurysmal change would have been expected to occur, no differences in absolute size or calculated elliptical cross-sectional vessel area were found. Patients after eversion endarterectomy did not show signs of aneurysmal changes in the area of reinsertion at the carotid bifurcation.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in the long-term, for this group of patients, no significant aneurysmal changes of arterial reconstructions in carotid surgery performed with absorbable sutures were observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19005721     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9794-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  20 in total

1.  Absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in microsurgery: standardized comparable studies in rats.

Authors:  A Thiede; K Lütjohann; C Beck; F Blunck
Journal:  J Microsurg       Date:  1979 Nov-Dec

2.  Comparison between absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures in arterial anastomoses in growing dogs.

Authors:  B Gersak
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.888

3.  Improved growth with bioabsorbable sutures in both high- and low-pressure zones.

Authors:  L K von Segesser; M Lachat; S Duewell; D Gianom; M I Turina
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Absorbable suture materials for vascular anastomoses. Tensile strength and axial pressure studies using polyglycolic acid sutures.

Authors:  G Ross; C Pavlides; F Long; A Kusaba; M Perlman; T Matsumoto
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Suture resistance to infection.

Authors:  W V Sharp; T A Belden; P H King; P C Teague
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  [Blood vessel wall regeneration in the use of a new monofilament, resorbable suture material for arterial anastomoses].

Authors:  T Schmitz-Rixen; S Horsch; B Klein; H Pichlmaier
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1984

7.  Vascular anastomoses with absorbable suture material: an experimental study.

Authors:  T Schmitz-Rixen; M Storck; H Erasmi; P Schmiegelow; S Horsch
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 1.466

8.  The efficacy of absorbable suture for microvascular anastomoses.

Authors:  M P Fried; D S Caminear; E R Sloman-Moll
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1990-09

9.  Initial evaluation of absorbable polydioxanone suture for peripheral vascular surgery.

Authors:  S W Merrell; P F Lawrence
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Polydioxanone and polypropylene suture material in free internal mammary artery graft anastomoses.

Authors:  P Aarnio; A Harjula; A Lehtola; H Sariola; S Mattila
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.