Literature DB >> 19005667

New indicator approaches for effective urban air quality management.

P J Peterson1, W P Williams.   

Abstract

Measurements of urban air quality at monitoring stations in developed countries have frequently involved the criteria gaseous pollutants, particulates, hazardous air pollutants, perceived air quality and relevant meteorological conditions. Large numbers of indicators have therefore been established to quantify emissions, concentrations and environmental and human health impacts of each of these groups of substances. To simplify the data for management, several indicators have been grouped together to form urban air quality indices but the weightings of individual variables is contentious. In industrialising and developing countries, data may be limited and traditional air pollutant indicators cannot often be constructed. The emphasis therefore has to be placed on the development of policy-relevant indicators, such as Response Indicators that reflect different policy principles for regulating air pollutant emissions. Indices that quantify the air quality management capabilities and capacities at the city level provide further useful decision-relevant tools. Four sets of indices, namely, 1. air quality measurement capacity, 2. data assessment and availability, 3. emissions estimates, and 4. management enabling capabilities, and a composite index to evaluate air quality management capability, were constructed and applied to 80 cities. The indices revealed that management capability varied widely between the cities. In some of the cities, existing national knowledge on urban air quality could have been more effectively used for management. It was concluded that for effective urban air quality management, a greater emphasis should be given, not just to monitoring and data capture programmes, but to the development of indicators and indices that empower decision-makers to initiate management response strategies. Over-reliance on restricted, predetermined sets of traditional air quality indicators should be avoided.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 19005667     DOI: 10.1007/BF02987334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  2 in total

1.  A set of suggested air quality indices for Canada.

Authors:  H Inhaber
Journal:  Atmos Environ       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  A quantitative evaluation of the pollutant standards index.

Authors:  W R Ott; W F Hunt
Journal:  J Air Pollut Control Assoc       Date:  1976-11
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Extending the use of air quality indices to reflect effective population exposure.

Authors:  Aleksandra M Zujić; Bojan B Radak; Anka J Filipović; Dragan A Marković
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Impact of 2013 south Asian haze crisis: study of physical and psychological symptoms and perceived dangerousness of pollution level.

Authors:  Roger C Ho; Melvyn W Zhang; Cyrus S Ho; Fang Pan; Yanxia Lu; Vijay K Sharma
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.630

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.