Literature DB >> 19005131

So many databases, such little clarity: Searching the literature for the topic aboriginal.

Len Kelly1, Natalie St Pierre-Hansen.   

Abstract

ABSTRACTOBJECTIVETo describe the scope, content, and organization of commonly used medical databases and search strategies, using a search of the topic aboriginal to illustrate the various ways the topic is covered in each of the databases.DESIGNComparison of literature searches.METHODSeven common medical databases were searched using all the MeSH terms that are permutations of aboriginal. A secondary analysis using the "remove duplicates" function in Ovid was done to identify articles specific to each database.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESNumber of articles found by each search.RESULTSSearching by MeSH terms often produces very different information from that found when searching by text word. A unique term, such as Ojibway, is best found with a text word search. A more general term, such as Aborigines, is best searched by subject using a MeSH term. Many databases can be searched through Ovid and might all use different MeSH terms for the same reference. PubMed default searches that use MeSH terms and text words simultaneously often produce very large numbers of articles. In searching for North American aboriginal using MeSH terms, MEDLINE and PubMed produced the most references, followed by Healthstar. Calculating distinct "all aboriginal" references in EMBASE, Healthstar, and PsycINFO indicated that MEDLINE produced nearly all the articles found in Healthstar. In fact, MEDLINE alone produced 88% of the articles found in MEDLINE and EMBASE and 79% of the articles found in MEDLINE and PsycINFO.CONCLUSIONAlthough several researchers and medical librarians have noted that MEDLINE and EMBASE are quite distinct databases, suggesting both need to be searched for a complete search, we did not find that to be the case for the topic aboriginal. The results of this study demonstrate that using MEDLINE produces the most extensive coverage of literature on the topic aboriginal. To fully capture the complete body of available literature on other subjects might require searches of many databases, depending on the topic.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19005131      PMCID: PMC2592335     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  12 in total

1.  The pond is wider than you think! Problems encountered when searching family practice literature.

Authors:  W W Rosser; C Starkey; R Shaughnessy
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Searching the right database. A comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals.

Authors:  S McDonald; L Taylor; C Adams
Journal:  Health Libr Rev       Date:  1999-09

3.  Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).

Authors:  C E Lipscomb
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2000-07

4.  A comparison of the coverage of clinical medicine provided by PASCAL BIOMED and MEDLINE.

Authors:  D L Brand-de Heer
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2001-06

5.  Medical subject headings used to search the biomedical literature.

Authors:  M H Coletti; H L Bleich
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Comparison of Medical Subject Headings and text-word searches in MEDLINE to retrieve studies on sleep in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Jenuwine; Judith A Floyd
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-07

7.  EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree?

Authors:  Thad Wilkins; Ralph A Gillies; Kathy Davies
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Medline and Embase complement each other in literature searches.

Authors:  D Woods; K Trewheellar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-04-11

Review 9.  How to read a paper. The Medline database.

Authors:  T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-07-19

10.  Optimal search strategies for identifying sound clinical prediction studies in EMBASE.

Authors:  Jennifer L Holland; Nancy L Wilczynski; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  8 in total

1.  Search strategies to identify reports on "off-label" drug use in EMBASE.

Authors:  Bita Mesgarpour; Markus Müller; Harald Herkner
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-12-29       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Fate of manuscripts rejected by a non-English-language general medical journal: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Siri Vinther; Jacob Rosenberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Evidence mapping for decision making: feasibility versus accuracy - when to abandon high sensitivity in electronic searches.

Authors:  Barbara Buchberger; Laura Krabbe; Beate Lux; Jessica Tajana Mattivi
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-19

4.  Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?

Authors:  Thomas Aagaard; Hans Lund; Carsten Juhl
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 5.  Comparison of study samples recruited with virtual versus traditional recruitment methods.

Authors:  Heidi Moseson; Shefali Kumar; Jessie L Juusola
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2020-06-17

Review 6.  The THRIVE model: A framework and review of internal and external predictors of coping with chronic illness.

Authors:  Katherine White; Marianne Sm Issac; Claire Kamoun; Jessica Leygues; Simon Cohn
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2018-08-21

Review 7.  Mechanical properties of provisional dental materials: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniela Astudillo-Rubio; Andrés Delgado-Gaete; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José María Montiel-Company; Agustín Pascual-Moscardó; José Manuel Almerich-Silla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies.

Authors:  Chris Cooper; Andrew Booth; Jo Varley-Campbell; Nicky Britten; Ruth Garside
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 4.615

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.