Literature DB >> 19004809

Binocular spatial induction for the perception of depth does not cross the midline.

Todd E Hudson1, Leonard Matin, Wenxun Li.   

Abstract

Although horizontal binocular retinal disparity between images in the two eyes resulting from their different views of the world has long been the centerpiece for understanding the unique characteristics of stereovision, it does not suffice to explain many binocular phenomena. Binocular depth contrast (BDC), the induction of an appearance of visual pitch in a centrally located line by pitched-from-vertical flanking lines, has particularly been the subject of a good deal of attention in this regard. In the present article, we show that BDC does not cross the median plane but is restricted to the side of the visual field containing a unilateral inducer. These results cannot be explained by the use of retinal disparity alone or in combination with any additional factors or processes previously suggested to account for stereovision. We present a two-channel three-stage neuromathematical model that accounts quantitatively for present and previous BDC results and also accounts for a large number of the most prominent features of binocular pitch perception: Stage 1 of the differencing channel obtains the difference between the retinal orientations of the images in the two eyes separately for the inducer and the test line; stage 1 of the summing channel obtains the corresponding sums. Signals from inducer and test stimuli are combined linearly in each channel in stage 2, and in stage 3 the outputs from the two channels are combined along with a bias signal from the body-referenced mechanism to yield ', the model's prediction for the perception of pitch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19004809      PMCID: PMC2584671          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0807385105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Spatial summation of foveal increments and decrements.

Authors:  T E Cohn; D J Lasley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Visually perceived eye level with reversible pitch stimuli: implications for the great circle and implicit surface models.

Authors:  B Robert Post; Jacque M Teague; Robert B Welch; Todd E Hudson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Binocular vision: two possible central interactions between signals from two eyes.

Authors:  T E Cohn; D J Lasley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The influence of perspective and disparity cues on the perception of slant.

Authors:  W M Youngs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Visually perceived eye level and perceived elevation of objects: linearly additive influences from visual field pitch and from gravity.

Authors:  L Matin; C R Fox
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  The visibility of transient changes of luminance.

Authors:  C Rashbass
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The role of vertical disparity in the scaling of stereoscopic depth perception: an empirical and theoretical study.

Authors:  B Gillam; D Chambers; B Lawergren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-11

9.  The induced effect, vertical disparity, and stereoscopic theory.

Authors:  B Gillam; B Lawergren
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-08

10.  Binocular luminance detection: availability of more than one central interaction.

Authors:  T E Cohn; H Leong; D J Lasley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.