Literature DB >> 19004444

Stomach stress and strain depend on location, direction and the layered structure.

Jingbo Zhao1, Donghua Liao, Pengmin Chen, Peter Kunwald, Hans Gregersen.   

Abstract

The stomach is as other parts of the gastrointestinal tract functionally subjected to dimensional change. Hence, the biomechanical properties are of functional importance. Our group has previously demonstrated that the stress-strain properties of the rat and rabbit stomach wall were species-, location- and direction-dependent. We further wanted to study the anisotropic biomechanical properties of the stomach wall in pigs. Furthermore, we made an in-depth biomechanical test on the layered wall of the stomach in different regions. Two stomach strips were cut both in longitudinal direction (parallel with the greater curvature) and circumferential direction (perpendicular to the greater curvature) from the gastric fundus, corpus and antrum. One strip was used for the non-separated (intact) wall test and the other one was separated for the test on the mucosa-submucosa and muscle layers individually. The length, thickness and width of each strip were measured from digital images. The uni-axial stress and strain were computed from the force generation and the tissue strip deformation during stretching. The muscle layer was the thickest in the antrum whereas the mucosal-submucosal layer was the thickest in the corpus of the stomach (P<0.01). The strips from the corpus were stiffest among the three regions in both longitudinal and circumferential directions (P<0.001). The longitudinal strips was stiffer than the circumferential strips in all three regions (P<0.001) and the mucosa-submucosa strips was stiffer than the intact wall and the muscle layer in both directions for the fundus and the corpus (P<0.001). The constant a of the intact wall and mucosa-submucosa layer was in both directions linearly associated with the mucosa-submucosa thickness. In conclusion, the uni-axial stress-strain curves of pig stomach were location-, direction- and layer-dependent. The stiffer wall in the corpus is likely due to its thicker mucosa, i.e., the stiffness of the mucosa-submucosa layer seems can explain the intact wall stiffness. Since the structure and function of the pig stomach are similar to the human stomach, we believe that the data obtained from this study can be extended to humans. Detailed biomechanical mapping of the stomach will likely help us to understand physiological functions of the different parts of the human stomach, such as gastric accommodation and mechanosensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19004444     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  In vivo Layer-specific Mechanical Characterization of Porcine Stomach Tissue using Ultrasound Elastography.

Authors:  Saurabh Dargar; Uwe Kruger; Suvranu De
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  An Experimental Study of Intraluminal Hyperpressure Reproducing a Gastric Leak Following a Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Lysa Marie; Catherine Masson; Bénédicte Gaborit; Stéphane V Berdah; Thierry Bège
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  In Situ Mechanical Characterization of Multilayer Soft Tissue Using Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Saurabh Dargar; Ali C Akyildiz; Suvranu De
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Biomechanical constitutive modeling of the gastrointestinal tissues: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bhavesh Patel; Alessio Gizzi; Javad Hashemi; Yousif Awakeem; Hans Gregersen; Ghassan Kassab
Journal:  Mater Des       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 9.417

Review 5.  Gut feelings: mechanosensing in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Arnaldo Mercado-Perez; Arthur Beyder
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 73.082

6.  Efficacy and safety of a novel submucosal lifting gel used for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a study in a porcine model.

Authors:  D W Schölvinck; L Alvarez Herrero; O Goto; S L Meijer; H Neuhaus; B Schumacher; J J G H M Bergman; B L A M Weusten
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Power type strain energy function model and prediction of the anisotropic mechanical properties of skin using uniaxial extension data.

Authors:  Lin Li; Xiuqing Qian; Hui Wang; Lin Hua; Haixia Zhang; Zhicheng Liu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Porcine Stomach Smooth Muscle Force Depends on History-Effects.

Authors:  André Tomalka; Mischa Borsdorf; Markus Böl; Tobias Siebert
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.566

9.  Computational evaluation of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Authors:  Ilaria Toniolo; Chiara Giulia Fontanella; Michel Gagner; Cesare Stefanini; Mirto Foletto; Emanuele Luigi Carniel
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.