Literature DB >> 19004189

Biomarkers of liver fibrosis.

Thierry Poynard1, Rachel Morra, Patrick Ingiliz, Françoise Imbert-Bismut, Dominique Thabut, Djamila Messous, Mona Munteanu, Julien Massard, Yves Benhamou, Vlad Ratziu.   

Abstract

Liver biopsy, due to its limitations and risks, is an imperfect gold standard for assessing the severity of the most frequent chronic liver diseases. This chapter summarized the advantages and the limits of the available biomarkers of liver fibrosis. Among a total of 2237 references, a total of 14 validated biomarkers have been identified between 1991 and 2007. Nine were not patented and five were patented. FibroTest (FT) was the most studied test with 33 different populations including 6549 patients and 925 controls. The mean diagnostic value for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis assessed using standardized area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves was 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83-0.86], without significant difference between the causes of liver disease, hepatitis C, hepatitis B, alcoholic or nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. High-risk profiles of false negative/positive of FT are present in 3% of populations, mainly Gilbert syndrome, hemolysis, and acute inflammation. FT has higher accuracy than aspartate aminotransferase/platelets ratio index (APRI), the most used nonpatented test. No significant difference has been observed between the five patented tests. A quality score has been assessed in order to compare the quality of fibrosis biomarkers. Neither biomarkers nor biopsy are sufficient alone to take definitive decision in a given patient and all the clinical and biological data must be taken into account. Due to the evidence-based data, health authorities in some countries have already approved validated biomarkers as first-line procedure for the staging of liver fibrosis. This overview of evidence-based data suggests that biomarkers could be used as an alternative to liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis stage in the four more common chronic liver diseases: C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and alcoholic liver disease (ALD). Neither biomarkers nor biopsy are sufficient alone to take definitive decision in a given patient and all the clinical and biological data must be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19004189     DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2423(08)00404-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Clin Chem        ISSN: 0065-2423            Impact factor:   5.394


  19 in total

1.  Prognostic value of liver fibrosis biomarkers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thierry Poynard; Yen Ngo; Hugo Perazzo; Mona Munteanu; Pascal Lebray; Joseph Moussalli; Dominique Thabut; Yves Benhamou; Vlad Ratziu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-07

Review 2.  Targeting Hepatic Fibrosis in Autoimmune Hepatitis.

Authors:  Aldo J Montano-Loza; Ragesh B Thandassery; Albert J Czaja
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Treatment Options in Hepatitis C.

Authors:  Stefan Zeuzem
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Effective use of FibroTest to generate decision trees in hepatitis C.

Authors:  Dana Lau-Corona; Luís Alberto Pineda; Héctor Hugo Avilés; Gabriela Gutiérrez-Reyes; Blanca Eugenia Farfan-Labonne; Rafael Núñez-Nateras; Alan Bonder; Rosalinda Martínez-García; Clara Corona-Lau; Marco Antonio Olivera-Martínez; Maria-Concepción Gutiérrez-Ruiz; Guillermo Robles-Díaz; David Kershenobich
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Critical comparison of elastography methods to assess chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Thierry Poynard; Laurent Castera
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Noninvasive Markers of Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B.

Authors:  Thierry Poynard; Yen Ngo; Mona Munteanu; Dominique Thabut; Vlad Ratziu
Journal:  Curr Hepat Rep       Date:  2011-03-01

7.  Noninvasive parameters and hepatic fibrosis scores in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Hye Ran Yang; Hae Ryoung Kim; Myung Jin Kim; Jae Sung Ko; Jeong Kee Seo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  The evaluation of hepatic fibrosis scores in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Sana Mansoor; Lisa Yerian; Rohit Kohli; Stavra Xanthakos; Paul Angulo; Simon Ling; Rocio Lopez; Carter-Kent Christine; Ariel E Feldstein; Naim Alkhouri
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Using immunoproteomics to identify alpha-enolase as an autoantigen in liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Bo Peng; Xueyong Huang; Ernesto S Nakayasu; John R Petersen; Suimin Qiu; Igor C Almeida; Jian-Ying Zhang
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Assessment of liver fibrosis: noninvasive means.

Authors:  Thierry Poynard; Rachel Morra; Patrick Ingiliz; Françoise Imbert-Bismut; Dominique Thabut; Djamila Messous; Mona Munteanu; Julien Massard; Yves Benhamou; Vlad Ratziu
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.