Literature DB >> 19003362

Dielectrophoretic forces can be safely used to retain viable cells in perfusion cultures of animal cells.

A Docoslis1, N Kalogerakis, L A Behie.   

Abstract

Dielectrophoresis is a well established and effective means for the manipulation of viable cells. However, its effectiveness greatly depends upon the utilization of very low electrical conductivity media. High conductivity media, as in the case of cell culture media, result only in the induction of weaker repulsive forces (negative dielectrophoresis) and excessive medium heating. A dielectrophoresis-based cell separation device (DEP-filter) has been recently developed for perfusion cultures that successfully overcomes these obstacles and provides a very high degree of viable cell separation while most of the nonviable cells are removed from the bioreactor by the effluent stream. The latter results in high viabilities throughout the culture period and minimization of lysed cell proteases in the bioreactor. However, an important question that remains to be answered is whether we have any adverse effects by exposing the cultured cells to high frequency electric fields for extended periods of time. A special chamber was constructed to quantitate the effect under several operational conditions. Cell growth, glucose uptake, lactate and monoclonal antibody production data suggest that there is no appreciable effect and hence, operation over long periods of time of the DEP-filter should not have any adverse effect on the cultured cells.

Entities:  

Year:  1999        PMID: 19003362      PMCID: PMC3449951          DOI: 10.1023/A:1008050809217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotechnology        ISSN: 0920-9069            Impact factor:   2.058


  34 in total

1.  Spin filter perfusion system for high density cell culture: production of recombinant urinary type plasminogen activator in CHO cells.

Authors:  G C Avgerinos; D Drapeau; J S Socolow; J I Mao; K Hsiao; R J Broeze
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1990-01

Review 2.  Interaction of cell culture with downstream purification: a case study.

Authors:  W Berthold; R Kempken
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Acoustic cell filter for high density perfusion culture of hybridoma cells.

Authors:  F Trampler; S A Sonderhoff; P W Pui; D G Kilburn; J M Piret
Journal:  Biotechnology (N Y)       Date:  1994-03

4.  Enhanced antibody production associated with altered amino acid metabolism in a hybridoma high-density perfusion culture established by gravity separation.

Authors:  H A Hansen; B Damgaard; C Emborg
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 5.  Cell death (apoptosis) in cell culture systems.

Authors:  T G Cotter; M al-Rubeai
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 19.536

6.  Viable cell recycle with an inclined settler in the perfusion culture of suspended recombinant Chinese hamster ovary cells.

Authors:  J A Searles; P Todd; D S Kompala
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr

7.  A novel ultrasonic resonance field device for the retention of animal cells.

Authors:  O Doblhoff-Dier; T Gaida; H Katinger; W Burger; M Gröschl; E Benes
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug

8.  Effect of 50 Hz sinusoidal electric and/or magnetic fields on the rate of repair of DNA single strand breaks in cultured mammalian cells exposed to three different carcinogens: methylmethane sulphonate, chromate and 254 nm U.V. radiation.

Authors:  O Cantoni; P Sestili; M Fiorani; M Dachà
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Int       Date:  1996-03

9.  Separation of viable and non-viable yeast using dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  G H Markx; M S Talary; R Pethig
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 3.307

10.  Vortex flow filtration of mammalian and insect cells.

Authors:  S J Hawrylik; D J Wasilko; J S Pillar; J B Cheng; S E Lee
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.058

View more
  8 in total

1.  Geometric and material determinants of patterning efficiency by dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  Dirk R Albrecht; Robert L Sah; Sangeeta N Bhatia
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Modeling of dielectrophoretic transport of myoglobin molecules in microchannels.

Authors:  Naga Siva Kumar Gunda; Sushanta Kumar Mitra
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Dielectrophoretic traps for single-particle patterning.

Authors:  Adam Rosenthal; Joel Voldman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Advancing practical usage of microtechnology: a study of the functional consequences of dielectrophoresis on neural stem cells.

Authors:  Jente Lu; Chesca A Barrios; Amanda R Dickson; Jamison L Nourse; Abraham P Lee; Lisa A Flanagan
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.192

Review 5.  Direct assembling methodologies for high-throughput bioscreening.

Authors:  Jorge I Rodríguez-Dévora; Zhi-dong Shi; Tao Xu
Journal:  Biotechnol J       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Engineering amount of cell-cell contact demonstrates biphasic proliferative regulation through RhoA and the actin cytoskeleton.

Authors:  Darren S Gray; Wendy F Liu; Colette J Shen; Kiran Bhadriraju; Celeste M Nelson; Christopher S Chen
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  Correlation between dielectric property by dielectrophoretic levitation and growth activity of cells exposed to electric field.

Authors:  Masaru Hakoda; Yusuke Hirota
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 8.  Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non-parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME.

Authors:  Patricio Godoy; Nicola J Hewitt; Ute Albrecht; Melvin E Andersen; Nariman Ansari; Sudin Bhattacharya; Johannes Georg Bode; Jennifer Bolleyn; Christoph Borner; Jan Böttger; Albert Braeuning; Robert A Budinsky; Britta Burkhardt; Neil R Cameron; Giovanni Camussi; Chong-Su Cho; Yun-Jaie Choi; J Craig Rowlands; Uta Dahmen; Georg Damm; Olaf Dirsch; María Teresa Donato; Jian Dong; Steven Dooley; Dirk Drasdo; Rowena Eakins; Karine Sá Ferreira; Valentina Fonsato; Joanna Fraczek; Rolf Gebhardt; Andrew Gibson; Matthias Glanemann; Chris E P Goldring; María José Gómez-Lechón; Geny M M Groothuis; Lena Gustavsson; Christelle Guyot; David Hallifax; Seddik Hammad; Adam Hayward; Dieter Häussinger; Claus Hellerbrand; Philip Hewitt; Stefan Hoehme; Hermann-Georg Holzhütter; J Brian Houston; Jens Hrach; Kiyomi Ito; Hartmut Jaeschke; Verena Keitel; Jens M Kelm; B Kevin Park; Claus Kordes; Gerd A Kullak-Ublick; Edward L LeCluyse; Peng Lu; Jennifer Luebke-Wheeler; Anna Lutz; Daniel J Maltman; Madlen Matz-Soja; Patrick McMullen; Irmgard Merfort; Simon Messner; Christoph Meyer; Jessica Mwinyi; Dean J Naisbitt; Andreas K Nussler; Peter Olinga; Francesco Pampaloni; Jingbo Pi; Linda Pluta; Stefan A Przyborski; Anup Ramachandran; Vera Rogiers; Cliff Rowe; Celine Schelcher; Kathrin Schmich; Michael Schwarz; Bijay Singh; Ernst H K Stelzer; Bruno Stieger; Regina Stöber; Yuichi Sugiyama; Ciro Tetta; Wolfgang E Thasler; Tamara Vanhaecke; Mathieu Vinken; Thomas S Weiss; Agata Widera; Courtney G Woods; Jinghai James Xu; Kathy M Yarborough; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 5.153

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.