Literature DB >> 19001393

Agreement rates for sleep/wake judgments obtained via accelerometer and sleep diary: a comparison.

Tomoyuki Kawada1.   

Abstract

Agreement rates for waking and sleeping obtained via sleep diary and accelerometer were evaluated, to compare the two methods. Sleep/wake data for consecutive days and nights were surveyed in 119 healthy university students. Accelerometer sleep/wake judgments obeyed the standard algorithm. Agreement rates for waking and sleeping according to accelerometer versus sleep diary, respectively, were calculated. Sleep diary data were set as a baseline. Seventy-six subjects (63.9%), 22 to 32 years of age, presented perfect data for the analysis. The mean sleep times, in minutes, judged by sleep diary and by accelerometer, were 482.3 and 629.6, respectively. The mean percentages and standard deviations of agreement on wake and sleep were 77.5% (SD = 10.2) and 86.1% (SD = 6.2), respectively. There was a significant negative relationship between the agreement rates for wake and sleep (r = -.482, p < .01). The accelerometer showed some measurement failure during waking, presumably because of the decrease in body movement. Sleep diary data during daytime appear to be more valid for detecting a sleep/wake cycle than are accelerometer data. In contrast, nocturnal sleep diary data might be supplemented by the use of an accelerometer as long as participants do not have insomnia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001393     DOI: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  7 in total

1.  Actigraphy and Sleep Diary Measurements in Breast Cancer Survivors: Discrepancy in Selected Sleep Parameters.

Authors:  Camille M Moore; Sarah J Schmiege; Ellyn E Matthews
Journal:  Behav Sleep Med       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.964

2.  How many days are needed for a reliable assessment by the Sleep Diary?

Authors:  Diego de Alcantara Borba; Raquel Sousa Reis; Pedro Henrique Tadeu de Melo Lima; Lucas Alves Facundo; Fernanda Veruska Narciso; Andressa Silva; Marco Túlio de Mello
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar

3.  Physical activity, sleep, and fatigue in community dwelling Stroke Survivors.

Authors:  Anthony I Shepherd; Richard Pulsford; Leon Poltawski; Anne Forster; Rod S Taylor; Anne Spencer; Laura Hollands; Martin James; Rhoda Allison; Meriel Norris; Raff Calitri; Sarah G Dean
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marco Giurgiu; Irina Timm; Marlissa Becker; Steffen Schmidt; Kathrin Wunsch; Rebecca Nissen; Denis Davidovski; Johannes B J Bussmann; Claudio R Nigg; Markus Reichert; Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer; Alexander Woll; Birte von Haaren-Mack
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.947

5.  Using Actiwatch to monitor circadian rhythm disturbance in Huntington' disease: A cautionary note.

Authors:  Jenny Townhill; Alis C Hughes; Benny Thomas; Monica E Busse; Kathy Price; Stephen B Dunnett; Michael H Hastings; Anne E Rosser
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  The health and well-being of Australia's future medical doctors: protocol for a 5-year observational cohort study of medical trainees.

Authors:  Erin Cvejic; Gordon Parker; Samuel B Harvey; Zachery Steel; Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic; Claire L Macnamara; Uté Vollmer-Conna
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Association among Weather Conditions, Ambient Air Temperature, and Sedentary Time in Chinese Adults.

Authors:  Xu Wen; Yiqun Ma; Bing Yuan; Fubaihui Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.