OBJECTIVE: To characterize the functional neuroanatomy of late-life depression (LLD) by probing for both episodic and persistent alterations in the executive-control circuit of elderly adults. DESIGN: Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected while participants performed an executive-control task. SETTING: Participants were recruited through a depression-treatment study within the Pittsburgh, PA, Intervention Research Center for Late-Life Mood Disorders. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen nondepressed elderly comparison participants and 13 LLD patients. INTERVENTION: The depressed patients underwent imaging before initiating and after completing 12 weeks of paroxetine. MEASUREMENTS: Regional fMRI activity was assessed in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC: BA9 and BA46 bilaterally) and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Functional connectivity was assessed by correlating the fMRI time-series in the dLPFC and dACC. RESULTS: Both depressed and comparison participants performed the task as expected, with greater response latency during high versus low-load trials. The response-latency load-effect did not differ between groups. In contrast to the null findings for behavioral data, pretreatment, depressed patients showed diminished activity in the dLPFC (BA46 left, t(25)=1.9, p = 0.035) and diminished functional connectivity between the dLPFC and dACC. Moreover, right dLPFC (BA46 right, t(25)=2.17, p < 0.02) showed increased activity after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results support a model of both episodic and persistent neurobiologic components of LLD. The altered functional connectivity,perhaps due to vascular damage to frontal white matter, appears to be persistent. Further, at least some of the prefrontal hypoactivity (in the right dLPFC) seems to be an episodic characteristic of acute depression amenable to treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the functional neuroanatomy of late-life depression (LLD) by probing for both episodic and persistent alterations in the executive-control circuit of elderly adults. DESIGN: Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were collected while participants performed an executive-control task. SETTING:Participants were recruited through a depression-treatment study within the Pittsburgh, PA, Intervention Research Center for Late-Life Mood Disorders. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen nondepressed elderly comparison participants and 13 LLD patients. INTERVENTION: The depressedpatients underwent imaging before initiating and after completing 12 weeks of paroxetine. MEASUREMENTS: Regional fMRI activity was assessed in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC: BA9 and BA46 bilaterally) and the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC). Functional connectivity was assessed by correlating the fMRI time-series in the dLPFC and dACC. RESULTS: Both depressed and comparison participants performed the task as expected, with greater response latency during high versus low-load trials. The response-latency load-effect did not differ between groups. In contrast to the null findings for behavioral data, pretreatment, depressedpatients showed diminished activity in the dLPFC (BA46 left, t(25)=1.9, p = 0.035) and diminished functional connectivity between the dLPFC and dACC. Moreover, right dLPFC (BA46 right, t(25)=2.17, p < 0.02) showed increased activity after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These results support a model of both episodic and persistent neurobiologic components of LLD. The altered functional connectivity,perhaps due to vascular damage to frontal white matter, appears to be persistent. Further, at least some of the prefrontal hypoactivity (in the right dLPFC) seems to be an episodic characteristic of acute depression amenable to treatment.
Authors: C S Carter; A M Macdonald; M Botvinick; L L Ross; V A Stenger; D Noll; J D Cohen Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: George S Alexopoulos; Dimitris N Kiosses; Sibel Klimstra; Balkrishna Kalayam; Martha L Bruce Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2002 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Faith M Gunning-Dixon; Michael Walton; Janice Cheng; Jessica Acuna; Sibel Klimstra; Molly E Zimmerman; Adam M Brickman; Matthew J Hoptman; Robert C Young; George S Alexopoulos Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Wenjun Li; B Douglas Ward; Chunming Xie; Jennifer L Jones; Piero G Antuono; Shi-Jiang Li; Joseph S Goveas Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Howard J Aizenstein; Alexander Khalaf; Sarah E Walker; Carmen Andreescu Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2013-12-30 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Minjie Wu; Carmen Andreescu; Meryl A Butters; Robert Tamburo; Charles F Reynolds; Howard Aizenstein Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2011-08-06 Impact factor: 3.222