Literature DB >> 19001288

On Spo16 and the coefficient of coincidence.

Franklin W Stahl1, Henriette M Foss.   

Abstract

spo16 mutants in yeast were reported to have reduced map lengths, a high frequency of nondisjunction in the first meiotic division, and essentially unchanged coefficients of coincidence. Were all crossing over in yeast subject to interference, such data would suggest that the "designation" of recombination events to become crossovers is separable from the "implementation" of that crossing over. In the presence of coexisting interference and noninterference phases of crossing over, however, lack of change in the coefficient of coincidence may show only that spo16 reduces crossing over in the two phases by a similar factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001288      PMCID: PMC2621181          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.097071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  8 in total

1.  Absence of interference in association with gene conversion in Sordaria fimicola, and presence of interference in association with ordinary recombination.

Authors:  Y Kitani
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Biochemical Mutants in the Smut Fungus Ustilago Maydis.

Authors:  D D Perkins
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1949-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Interaction of genetic and environmental factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae meiosis: the devil is in the details.

Authors:  Victoria E Cotton; Eva R Hoffmann; Mohammed F F Abdullah; Rhona H Borts
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

4.  Crossing over during Caenorhabditis elegans meiosis requires a conserved MutS-based pathway that is partially dispensable in budding yeast.

Authors:  J Zalevsky; A J MacQueen; J B Duffy; K J Kemphues; A M Villeneuve
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Chiasma interference as a function of genetic distance.

Authors:  E Foss; R Lande; F W Stahl; C M Steinberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Reduced mismatch repair of heteroduplexes reveals "non"-interfering crossing over in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Tony J Getz; Stephen A Banse; Lisa S Young; Allison V Banse; Johanna Swanson; Grace M Wang; Barclay L Browne; Henriette M Foss; Franklin W Stahl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis.

Authors:  Miki Shinohara; Steve D Oh; Neil Hunter; Akira Shinohara
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-02-24       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Does crossover interference count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

Authors:  Franklin W Stahl; Henriette M Foss; Lisa S Young; Rhona H Borts; M F F Abdullah; Gregory P Copenhaver
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Two types of meiotic crossovers coexist in maize.

Authors:  Matthieu Falque; Lorinda K Anderson; Stephen M Stack; Franck Gauthier; Olivier C Martin
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  Genetic analysis of variation in human meiotic recombination.

Authors:  Reshmi Chowdhury; Philippe R J Bois; Eleanor Feingold; Stephanie L Sherman; Vivian G Cheung
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.917

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.