D B Bailey1, K M Rassnick, O Kristal, J D Chretin, C E Balkman. 1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Sprecher Institute for Comparative Cancer Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA. dbb3@cornell.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vinblastine (VBL) is commonly used in dogs at a dosage of 2.0 mg/m2. The minimal toxicity observed at this dosage indicates that higher dosages might be well tolerated. HYPOTHESIS: The maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) for a single VBL treatment is higher than the previously published dosage of 2.0 mg/m2. ANIMALS: Twenty-three dogs with lymphoma or cutaneous mast cell tumors. METHODS: Dogs received 1 single-agent VBL treatment IV. The starting dosage was 3.0 mg/m2, and dosages were increased in increments of 0.5 mg/m2 in cohorts of 3 dogs. Hematologic toxicity was assessed with weekly CBCs. Gastrointestinal toxicity was assessed from medical histories from owners. Once the MTD was determined, additional dogs were treated with VBL at that dosage. Dogs whose cancers responded to VBL continued to receive treatments q2-3 weeks. RESULTS: VBL dosages ranged from 3.0 to 4.0 mg/m2. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity, with the nadir identified 7 days after treatment and resolving by 14 days after treatment. The MTD was 3.5 mg/m2. Sixteen dogs were treated at this dosage, and 3 experienced severe toxicity characterized by asymptomatic grade 4 neutropenia, febrile grade 4 neutropenia, and death. Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild and self-limiting. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was identified in 2 of 12 dogs with lymphoma treated at the MTD. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In dogs, single-agent VBL is well tolerated at a dosage of 3.5 mg/m2 IV. At this dosage, the minimum safe treatment interval is q2 weeks, and adjunct treatment with prophylactic antibiotics should be considered.
BACKGROUND:Vinblastine (VBL) is commonly used in dogs at a dosage of 2.0 mg/m2. The minimal toxicity observed at this dosage indicates that higher dosages might be well tolerated. HYPOTHESIS: The maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) for a single VBL treatment is higher than the previously published dosage of 2.0 mg/m2. ANIMALS: Twenty-three dogs with lymphoma or cutaneous mast cell tumors. METHODS:Dogs received 1 single-agent VBL treatment IV. The starting dosage was 3.0 mg/m2, and dosages were increased in increments of 0.5 mg/m2 in cohorts of 3 dogs. Hematologic toxicity was assessed with weekly CBCs. Gastrointestinal toxicity was assessed from medical histories from owners. Once the MTD was determined, additional dogs were treated with VBL at that dosage. Dogs whose cancers responded to VBL continued to receive treatments q2-3 weeks. RESULTS: VBL dosages ranged from 3.0 to 4.0 mg/m2. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity, with the nadir identified 7 days after treatment and resolving by 14 days after treatment. The MTD was 3.5 mg/m2. Sixteen dogs were treated at this dosage, and 3 experienced severe toxicity characterized by asymptomatic grade 4 neutropenia, febrile grade 4 neutropenia, and death. Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild and self-limiting. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was identified in 2 of 12 dogs with lymphoma treated at the MTD. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In dogs, single-agent VBL is well tolerated at a dosage of 3.5 mg/m2 IV. At this dosage, the minimum safe treatment interval is q2 weeks, and adjunct treatment with prophylactic antibiotics should be considered.
Authors: C Robat; C London; L Bunting; L McCartan; N Stingle; K Selting; I Kurzman; D M Vail Journal: Vet Comp Oncol Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 2.613
Authors: Andrigo Barboza de Nardi; Rodrigo Dos Santos Horta; Carlos Eduardo Fonseca-Alves; Felipe Noleto de Paiva; Laís Calazans Menescal Linhares; Bruna Fernanda Firmo; Felipe Augusto Ruiz Sueiro; Krishna Duro de Oliveira; Silvia Vanessa Lourenço; Ricardo De Francisco Strefezzi; Carlos Henrique Maciel Brunner; Marcelo Monte Mor Rangel; Paulo Cesar Jark; Jorge Luiz Costa Castro; Rodrigo Ubukata; Karen Batschinski; Renata Afonso Sobral; Natália Oyafuso da Cruz; Adriana Tomoko Nishiya; Simone Crestoni Fernandes; Simone Carvalho Dos Santos Cunha; Daniel Guimarães Gerardi; Guilherme Sellera Godoy Challoub; Luiz Roberto Biondi; Renee Laufer-Amorim; Paulo Ricardo de Oliveira Paes; Gleidice Eunice Lavalle; Rafael Ricardo Huppes; Fabrizio Grandi; Carmen Helena de Carvalho Vasconcellos; Denner Santos Dos Anjos; Ângela Cristina Malheiros Luzo; Julia Maria Matera; Miluse Vozdova; Maria Lucia Zaidan Dagli Journal: Cells Date: 2022-02-10 Impact factor: 6.600