BACKGROUND: In humans, atrial fibrillation (AF) induces electrical, contractile, and structural remodeling leading to AF stabilization. Little is known about AF-induced atrial remodeling in horses. HYPOTHESIS: Induced AF produces rapid atrial electrical and contractile remodeling in horses. ANIMALS: Six horses, 5 animals completed the study. METHODS: Each horse was instrumented with a pulse generator and pacemaker to maintain AF by burst pacing and to study atrial and ventricular electrophysiology (AF cycle length [AFCL], AF duration, and atrial/ventricular effective refractory period [AERP/VERP] at different pacing cycle lengths [PCL]). Left atrial and ventricular contractile remodeling were assessed echocardiographically by calculation of fractional changes in atrial and ventricular dimensions, respectively, during the cardiac cycle. Measurements were performed at baseline, a 7-day AF period and a 2-day recovery period. RESULTS: Atrial electrical and contractile remodeling could be demonstrated after 4 and 12 hours of AF, respectively. A progressive shortening of the AERP (261 +/- 39-171 +/- 18 ms at a PCL of 1,000 ms, P < .0001), an attenuation of the AERP rate adaptation, a decrease in AFCL (239 +/- 39-194 +/- 7 ms, P < .0001), and a decrease in atrial FS (12 +/- 3% to 0 +/- 2%, P < .05) occurred. AF duration increased progressively and became persistent in 2 animals. VERP did not change significantly. Upon restoration of sinus rhythm, values returned to baseline within 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Atrial electrical and contractile remodeling appears rapidly. After 7 days of AF, reverse remodeling occurred within 2 days. These observations suggest that early conversion of AF might be beneficial for success rate and early return to training.
BACKGROUND: In humans, atrial fibrillation (AF) induces electrical, contractile, and structural remodeling leading to AF stabilization. Little is known about AF-induced atrial remodeling in horses. HYPOTHESIS: Induced AF produces rapid atrial electrical and contractile remodeling in horses. ANIMALS: Six horses, 5 animals completed the study. METHODS: Each horse was instrumented with a pulse generator and pacemaker to maintain AF by burst pacing and to study atrial and ventricular electrophysiology (AF cycle length [AFCL], AF duration, and atrial/ventricular effective refractory period [AERP/VERP] at different pacing cycle lengths [PCL]). Left atrial and ventricular contractile remodeling were assessed echocardiographically by calculation of fractional changes in atrial and ventricular dimensions, respectively, during the cardiac cycle. Measurements were performed at baseline, a 7-day AF period and a 2-day recovery period. RESULTS: Atrial electrical and contractile remodeling could be demonstrated after 4 and 12 hours of AF, respectively. A progressive shortening of the AERP (261 +/- 39-171 +/- 18 ms at a PCL of 1,000 ms, P < .0001), an attenuation of the AERP rate adaptation, a decrease in AFCL (239 +/- 39-194 +/- 7 ms, P < .0001), and a decrease in atrial FS (12 +/- 3% to 0 +/- 2%, P < .05) occurred. AF duration increased progressively and became persistent in 2 animals. VERP did not change significantly. Upon restoration of sinus rhythm, values returned to baseline within 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Atrial electrical and contractile remodeling appears rapidly. After 7 days of AF, reverse remodeling occurred within 2 days. These observations suggest that early conversion of AF might be beneficial for success rate and early return to training.
Authors: Merle Friederike Fenner; Helena Carstensen; Sarah Dalgas Nissen; Eva Melis Hesselkilde; Christine Scott Lunddahl; Maja Adler Hess Jensen; Ameli Victoria Loft-Andersen; Stefan Michael Sattler; Pyotr Platonov; Said El-Haou; Claire Jackson; Raymond Tang; Robert Kirby; John Ford; Ulrich Schotten; James Milnes; Ulrik Svane Sørensen; Thomas Jespersen; Rikke Buhl Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2020-06-24 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Laura C Nath; Adrian D Elliott; Joe Weir; Peter Curl; Sarah M Rosanowski; Samantha Franklin Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: M M Haugaard; S Pehrson; H Carstensen; M Flethøj; E Z Hesselkilde; K F Praestegaard; J G Diness; M Grunnet; T Jespersen; R Buhl Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Eva Z Hesselkilde; Helena Carstensen; Maria M Haugaard; Jonas Carlson; Steen Pehrson; Thomas Jespersen; Rikke Buhl; Pyotr G Platonov Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Mengye Li; Karan R Chadda; Gareth D K Matthews; Celia M Marr; Christopher L-H Huang; Kamalan Jeevaratnam Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: A Decloedt; C C Schwarzwald; D De Clercq; N Van Der Vekens; B Pardon; V B Reef; G van Loon Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: V B Reef; J Bonagura; R Buhl; M K J McGurrin; C C Schwarzwald; G van Loon; L E Young Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Dominique De Clercq; Barbara Broux; Lisse Vera; Annelies Decloedt; Gunther van Loon Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 2.741