Literature DB >> 19000051

MRI and (1)H MRS of the breast: presence of a choline peak as malignancy marker is related to K21 value of the tumor in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma.

Patricia R Geraghty1, Maurice A A J van den Bosch, Daniel M Spielman, Sandeep Hunjan, Robyn L Birdwell, Katherine J Fong, Lara A Stables, Marowan Zakhour, Robert J Herfkens, Debra M Ikeda.   

Abstract

To assess which specific morphologic features, enhancement patterns, or pharmacokinetic parameters on breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) could predict a false-negative outcome of Proton MR Spectroscopy ((1)H MRS) exam in patients with invasive breast cancer. Sixteen patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast were prospectively included and underwent both, contrast-enhanced breast MRI and (1)H MRS examination of the breast. The MR images were reviewed and the lesions morphologic features, enhancement patterns and pharmacokinetic parameters (k21-value) were scored according to the ACR BI-RADS-MRI lexicon criteria. For the in vivo MRS studies, each spectrum was evaluated for the presence of choline based on consensus reading. Breast MRI and (1)H MRS data were compared to histopathologic findings. In vivo (1)H MRS detected a choline peak in 14/16 (88%) cancers. A false-negative (1)H MRS study occurred in 2/16 (14%) cancer patients. K21 values differed between both groups: the 14 choline positive cancers had k21 values ranging from 0.01 to 0.20/second (mean 0.083/second), whereas the two choline-negative cancers showed k21 values of 0.03 and 0.05/second, respectively (mean 0.040/second). Also enhancement kinetics did differ between both groups; typically both cancers that were choline-negative showed a late phase plateau (100%), whereas this was only shown in 5/14 (36%) of the choline positive cases. There was no difference between both groups with regard to morphologic features on MRI. This study showed that false-negative (1)H MRS examinations do occur in breast cancer patients, and that the presence of a choline peak on (1)H MRS as malignancy marker is related to the k21 value of the invasive tumor being imaged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000051      PMCID: PMC2842578          DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  23 in total

1.  Intensity-modulated parametric mapping for simultaneous display of rapid dynamic and high-spatial-resolution breast MR imaging data.

Authors:  A T Agoston; B L Daniel; R J Herfkens; D M Ikeda; R L Birdwell; S G Heiss; A M Sawyer-Glover
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  D M Ikeda; N M Hylton; K Kinkel; M G Hochman; C K Kuhl; W A Kaiser; J C Weinreb; S F Smazal; H Degani; P Viehweg; J Barclay; M D Schnall
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Clinical applications of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in the evaluation of common intracranial tumors.

Authors:  M Castillo; L Kwock
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-04

4.  Characterization of breast lesions with proton MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Eren D Yeh
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer.

Authors:  S G Orel; M D Schnall
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Characterization of lesions of the breast with proton MR spectroscopy: comparison of carcinomas, benign lesions, and phyllodes tumors.

Authors:  Gary M K Tse; Humairah S Cheung; Lai-Man Pang; Winnie C W Chu; Bonita K B Law; Fred Y L Kung; David K W Yeung
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; Melissa Joo-Young Lee; Jennifer B Kaplan; Linda R LaTrenta; Jennifer H Menell; Andrea F Abramson; Stephen M Dashnaw; Douglas J Ballon; D David Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Breast cancer: in vivo proton MR spectroscopy in the characterization of histopathologic subtypes and preliminary observations in axillary node metastases.

Authors:  David K W Yeung; Wei-Tse Yang; Gary M K Tse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Evaluation of total choline from in-vivo volume localized proton MR spectroscopy and its response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  N R Jagannathan; M Kumar; V Seenu; O Coshic; S N Dwivedi; P K Julka; A Srivastava; G K Rath
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  The added value of quantitative multi-voxel MR spectroscopy in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M D Dorrius; R M Pijnappel; M C van der Weide Jansen; L Jansen; P Kappert; M Oudkerk; P E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Analysis of cancer metabolism by imaging hyperpolarized nuclei: prospects for translation to clinical research.

Authors:  John Kurhanewicz; Daniel B Vigneron; Kevin Brindle; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Arnaud Comment; Charles H Cunningham; Ralph J Deberardinis; Gary G Green; Martin O Leach; Sunder S Rajan; Rahim R Rizi; Brian D Ross; Warren S Warren; Craig R Malloy
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Differential diagnosis of plasma cell mastitis and invasive ductal carcinoma using multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Rong Chen; Baoquan Hu; Yulong Zhang; Caibao Liu; Lianhua Zhao; Yan Jiang; Yan Xu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-04

Review 4.  In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jonathan K P Begley; Thomas W Redpath; Patrick J Bolan; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 5.  Cancer metabolic reprogramming: importance, main features, and potentials for precise targeted anti-cancer therapies.

Authors:  Liem Minh Phan; Sai-Ching Jim Yeung; Mong-Hong Lee
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.248

Review 6.  Imaging Cancer Metabolism.

Authors:  Milica Momcilovic; David B Shackelford
Journal:  Biomol Ther (Seoul)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.634

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.