Literature DB >> 18999973

A review of total laparoscopic hysterectomy using LigaSure uterine artery-sealing device: AIIMS experience.

Alka Kriplani1, Pradeep Garg, Meenakshi Sharma, Suman Lal, Nutan Agarwal.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) by using the Ligasure system for the sealing of uterine arteries.
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of cases who underwent TLH over 1.5 years. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital setting, at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (New Delhi, India). PATIENTS: A total of 110 patients of TLH done for uterine pathology [leiomyoma in 67 (60.9%), dysfunctional uterine bleeding in 34 (30.9%), and others in 9 (8.1%)].
INTERVENTIONS: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy, using the LigaSure system (Valleylab Inc., Boulder, CO), was done by the sealing of uterine arteries and Prashant Mangeshikar uterine manipulator for elevation of the uterus.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 43.1 +/- 0.602 years and mean body mass index was 25.19 +/- 0.39 kg/m(2). The mean operating time was 116.91 +/- 3.4 minutes, mean intraoperative blood loss was 173.09 +/- 11.64 mL, and the mean weight of the removed uterus was 224.14 +/- 17.62 g. Six patients were converted from a laparoscopic to an open procedure (large myoma in 4 and dense adhesion in 2) and 1 was converted to laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (tear in vaginal cuff). One patient (0.9%) developed lung emphysema during the intraoperative period. Postoperative complications included paralytic ileus in 3 (2.7%), retention of urine in 2 (1.8%), and febrile morbidity in 12 (10.9%) patients. There were no bladder or bowel injuries.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic hysterectomy by uterine artery sealing with LigaSure is a safe, efficient procedure with a low complication rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18999973     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2008.0034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

1.  Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™ (FUSE): a curriculum on surgical energy-based devices.

Authors:  Amin Madani; Daniel B Jones; Pascal Fuchshuber; Thomas N Robinson; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy (FUSE): An Essential Educational Program for Operating Room Safety.

Authors:  Stephanie B Jones; Malcolm G Munro; Liane S Feldman; Thomas N Robinson; L Michael Brunt; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Pascal R Fuchshuber
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2017

Review 3.  A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing energy devices used in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  M Charalambides; T Afxentiou; G Pellino; M P Powar; N S Fearnhead; R J Davies; J Wheeler; C Simillis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 4.  Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery.

Authors:  Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Rajeswara R Resapu; Daniel B Jones; Steven Schwaitzberg; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy:A prospective non-randomized trial.

Authors:  Bing Chen; Dong-Ping Ren; Jing-Xuan Li; Chun-Dong Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.088

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.