Literature DB >> 18999496

Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms.

Andrea Lancichinetti1, Santo Fortunato, Filippo Radicchi.   

Abstract

Community structure is one of the most important features of real networks and reveals the internal organization of the nodes. Many algorithms have been proposed but the crucial issue of testing, i.e., the question of how good an algorithm is, with respect to others, is still open. Standard tests include the analysis of simple artificial graphs with a built-in community structure, that the algorithm has to recover. However, the special graphs adopted in actual tests have a structure that does not reflect the real properties of nodes and communities found in real networks. Here we introduce a class of benchmark graphs, that account for the heterogeneity in the distributions of node degrees and of community sizes. We use this benchmark to test two popular methods of community detection, modularity optimization, and Potts model clustering. The results show that the benchmark poses a much more severe test to algorithms than standard benchmarks, revealing limits that may not be apparent at a first analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18999496     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.046110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  146 in total

1.  Modularity-based graph partitioning using conditional expected models.

Authors:  Yu-Teng Chang; Richard M Leahy; Dimitrios Pantazis
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2012-01-12

2.  Local hypergraph clustering using capacity releasing diffusion.

Authors:  Rania Ibrahim; David F Gleich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Multi-objective community detection based on memetic algorithm.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Li Pan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Assessing the consistency of community structure in complex networks.

Authors:  Matthew Steen; Satoru Hayasaka; Karen Joyce; Paul Laurienti
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2011-07-26

5.  Completeness of Community Structure in Networks.

Authors:  Jia-Rong Xie; Pan Zhang; Hai-Feng Zhang; Bing-Hong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Scalable detection of statistically significant communities and hierarchies, using message passing for modularity.

Authors:  Pan Zhang; Cristopher Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evolution of cooperation on large networks with community structure.

Authors:  Babak Fotouhi; Naghmeh Momeni; Benjamin Allen; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Dynamics on modular networks with heterogeneous correlations.

Authors:  Sergey Melnik; Mason A Porter; Peter J Mucha; James P Gleeson
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.642

Review 9.  Spatiotemporal positioning of multipotent modules in diverse biological networks.

Authors:  Yinying Chen; Zhong Wang; Yongyan Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Community landscapes: an integrative approach to determine overlapping network module hierarchy, identify key nodes and predict network dynamics.

Authors:  István A Kovács; Robin Palotai; Máté S Szalay; Peter Csermely
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.