Literature DB >> 18999471

Influence of finite thickness and stiffness on cellular adhesion-induced deformation of compliant substrata.

John M Maloney1, Emily B Walton, Christopher M Bruce, Krystyn J Van Vliet.   

Abstract

Thin, mechanically compliant coatings commonly serve as substrata for adherent cells in cell biology and biophysics studies, biological engineering applications, and biomedical device design. The deformation of such a coating at the cell-substratum interface defines the link between cellular traction, substratum stiffness, and the chemomechanical feedback mechanisms responsible for cellular mechanosensitivity. Here we apply elasticity theory to investigate how this deformation is affected by the finite thickness of such a cell substratum. The model idealizes a cellular adhesion site (e.g., a focal adhesion) as a circular area of uniform tangential traction, and compares the deformation of a compliant semi-infinite material to that of a coating of the same material supported by a rigid base. Two parameters are identified and considered: center displacement (as a measure of adhesion site displacement) and normal strain gradient (as a measure of adhesion site distortion). The attenuation of these parameters provides two measures for the influence of a finite coating thickness and underlying rigid base on cell-mediated deformation of the compliant substratum. A dimensionless term in the resulting solutions connects the coating thickness to the characteristic size of the adhesion sites. This relation, and calculations of the minimum thickness at which the rigid base is practically undetectable by an adherent cell, are supported by existing experimental literature and our observations of the projected area of fibroblasts adhered to polyacrylamide hydrogel coatings with various thicknesses atop relatively rigid glass. The model thus provides a tool for estimating the effective stiffness sensed by a cell attached to a compliant coating. We also identify and consider conceptualizations of critical thickness, or minimum suitable thickness for an application, which depend on both the frame of reference and the cell behavior of interest. The appropriate usage of different definitions resolves the disparity in values reported in the literature. Finally, the distinction between adhesion site displacement and distortion noted in this model could be useful in designing substrata to elucidate the controlling mechanisms of cellular mechanosensing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18999471     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.041923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  36 in total

1.  How deeply cells feel: methods for thin gels.

Authors:  Amnon Buxboim; Karthikan Rajagopal; Andre' E X Brown; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Phys Condens Matter       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.333

2.  Non-uniform breaking of molecular bonds, peripheral morphology and releasable adhesion by elastic anisotropy in bio-adhesive contacts.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Yanfei Gao
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Rho GTPases mediate the mechanosensitive lineage commitment of neural stem cells.

Authors:  Albert J Keung; Elena M de Juan-Pardo; David V Schaffer; Sanjay Kumar
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.277

4.  Nonlinear strain stiffening is not sufficient to explain how far cells can feel on fibrous protein gels.

Authors:  Mathilda S Rudnicki; Heather A Cirka; Maziar Aghvami; Edward A Sander; Qi Wen; Kristen L Billiar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Matrix elasticity, cytoskeletal forces and physics of the nucleus: how deeply do cells 'feel' outside and in?

Authors:  Amnon Buxboim; Irena L Ivanovska; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  A micropatterning and image processing approach to simplify measurement of cellular traction forces.

Authors:  Samuel R Polio; Katheryn E Rothenberg; Dimitrije Stamenović; Michael L Smith
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  The effect of substrate stiffness, thickness, and cross-linking density on osteogenic cell behavior.

Authors:  Conleth A Mullen; Ted J Vaughan; Kristen L Billiar; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Long-range force transmission in fibrous matrices enabled by tension-driven alignment of fibers.

Authors:  Hailong Wang; A S Abhilash; Christopher S Chen; Rebecca G Wells; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Substrates with patterned extracellular matrix and subcellular stiffness gradients reveal local biomechanical responses.

Authors:  Peter Tseng; Dino Di Carlo
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 30.849

10.  Durotaxis by Human Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Brian J DuChez; Andrew D Doyle; Emilios K Dimitriadis; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.