Literature DB >> 18998226

Measuring in situ reaction rate constants in wetland sediments.

Emma Bassein1, Peter R Jaffé.   

Abstract

Wetlands are ecologically important and play a key role in many environmentally significant chemical reactions. However, an accurate way of measuring in situ reaction rates in wetland sediments has yet to be established. This study evaluates the feasibility of adapting the push-pull test often used to measure in situ kinetics in subsurface environments, to wetlands. Experiments comparing the rates obtained with two methods, the push-pull test and a steady-state flow-through reactor, were conducted in a constructed wetland microcosm. First-order kinetic rate constants were determined for both sulfate and chromate reduction using both methods. Chromate reduction rates showed good agreement between the two methods, while sulfate reduction rates determined by the two methods differed significantly. Since the analysis for the push-pull test is based on a first-order kinetic, this discrepancy is likely due to the non-first-order behavior of sulfate reduction under the given environmental conditions. The largest obstacle identified prohibiting the use of this method is the availability of a tracer that is conservative in the presence of plants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18998226     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0612-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  10 in total

1.  In situ push-pull method to determine ground water denitrification in riparian zones.

Authors:  Kelly Addy; D Q Kellogg; Arthur J Gold; Peter M Groffman; Gina Ferendo; Carl Sawyer
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

2.  Microbial mechanisms of carbon removal in subsurface flow wetlands.

Authors:  J D C Baptista; T Donnelly; D Rayne; R J Davenport
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.915

3.  Denitrification in marine sediment: measurement of capacity and estimate of in situ rate.

Authors:  H F Kaspar
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Denitrification in san francisco bay intertidal sediments.

Authors:  R S Oremland; C Umberger; C W Culbertson; R L Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Potential rates and pathways of microbial nitrate reduction in coastal sediments.

Authors:  Anniet M Laverman; Philippe Van Cappellen; Debby van Rotterdam-Los; Céline Pallud; Jeffrey Abell
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.194

6.  The fate of estrogenic hormones in an engineered treatment wetland with dense macrophytes.

Authors:  James L Gray; David L Sedlak
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.946

7.  Push-pull tests to quantify in situ degradation rates at a phytoremediation site.

Authors:  Mark T Pitterle; Rikke G Andersen; John T Novak; Mark A Widdowson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Fate of nitrate and bromide in an unsaturated zone of a sandy soil under citrus production.

Authors:  S Paramasivam; A K Alva; A Fares; K S Sajwan
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.751

9.  Uptake of bromide by two wetland plants (Typha latifolia L. and Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud).

Authors:  Shangping Xu; Alessandra C Leri; Satish C B Myneni; Peter R Jaffe
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Influence of plants on the reduction of hexavalent chromium in wetland sediments.

Authors:  Juan A Zazo; Jeffery S Paull; Peter R Jaffe
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 8.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.