| Literature DB >> 18998200 |
Wei-Jun Cai1, Ming Bo Li, Xiaoqiong Wu, Song Wu, Wu Zhu, Dan Chen, Mingying Luo, Inka Eitenmüller, Andreas Kampmann, Jutta Schaper, Wolfgang Schaper.
Abstract
Migration and proliferation of smooth muscle cells (SMC) are important events during arteriogenesis, but the underlying mechanism is still only partially understood. The present study investigates the expression of integrins alpha 5 beta 1 and v beta 3 as well as focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and phosphorylated FAK (pY397), key mediators for cell migration and proliferation, in collateral vessels (CV) in rabbit hind limbs induced by femoral ligation or an arteriovenous (AV) shunt created between the distal femoral artery stump and the accompanying femoral vein by confocal immunofluorescence. In addition, the effect of the extracellular matrix components fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN), and Matrigel on expression of these focal adhesion molecules proliferation was studied in cultured SMCs. We found that: (1) in normal vessels (NV), both integrins alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha v beta 3 were mainly expressed in endothelial cells, very weak in smooth muscle cells (SMC); (2) in CVs, both alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha v beta 3 were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05); this was more evident in the shunt-side CVs, 1.5 and 1.3 times higher than that in the ligation side, respectively; (3) FAK and FAK(py397) were expressed in NVs and CVs in a similar profile as was alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha v beta 3; (4) in vitro SMCs cultured on fibronectin (overexpressed in collaterals) expressed higher levels of FAK, FAK (pY397), alpha 5 beta 1, and alpha v beta 3 than on laminin, whereas SMCs growing inside Matrigel expressed little of these proteins and showed no proliferation. In conclusion, our data demonstrate for the first time that the integrin-FAK signaling axis is activated in collateral vessels and that altered expression of FN and LN may play a crucial role in mediating the integrin-FAK signaling pathway activation. These findings explain a large part of the positive remodeling that collateral vessels undergo under the influence of high fluid shear stress.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2008 PMID: 18998200 PMCID: PMC2758386 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-008-9953-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Cell Biochem ISSN: 0300-8177 Impact factor: 3.396
Primary and secondary antibodies used in this study
| Antigen | Clone | Host | Dilution | Company |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrin αvβ3 | LM609 | Mouse | 1:100 | Chemicon |
| Integrin α5β1 | IBS5 | Mouse | 1:100 | Chemicon |
| FAK | 77 | Mouse | 1:100 | BD Transduction |
| FAK(pY397) | 14 | Mouse | 1:100 | BD Transduction |
| Anti-mouse-IgG | Donkey | 1:100 | Dianova, Germany |
Fig. 1Confocal micrographs of FAK and FAK(pY397) immunostaining in normal (NV), control (only ligation) (CLV), and AV-shunt (AV-S) collateral vessels. a–d: FAK; e: FAK(pY397). a: NV; b: CLV, c, d and e: AV-S. Note that AV-S showed strong staining for both FAK and FAK(pY397). d and e showing colocalization of FAK and FAK(pY397) in serial sections
Quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence density (AU/μm2) of FAK, FAK(py397), and integrins α5β1 and αvβ3 in normal (NV), control (only ligation) (CLV), and AV-shunt vessels (1 week)
| NV ( | CLV ( | AV-shunt (19) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAK | 66.31 ± 8.14 | 128.26 ± 8.30 | 166.32 ± 9.90* |
| FAK(pY397) | 24.86 ± 4.11 | 54.09 ± 7.13 | 81.28 ± 3.74* |
| α5β1 | 43.15 ± 4.27 | 93.0 ± 7.93 | 136.75 ± 10.05* |
| αvβ3 | 23.53 ± 3.41 | 80.08 ± 4.83 | 105.28 ± 9.59* |
1-way ANOVA test
* P < 0.05 versus CLV or NV
Fig. 2Confocal micrographs of FAK and FAK(pY397) immunostaining in smooth muscle cells cultured on different substances. F-actin was stained by Rodamin-labelled phalloidin. a–c: for FAK; d–f: for FAK(pY397); a and d: on fibronectin; b and e: on laminin; c and f: inside Matrigel basement membrane matrix. Note that fibronectin was the strongest stimulator of expression of FAK and FAK(pY397)
Quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence density (AU/μm2) of FAK, FAK(py397), and integrins α5β1 and αvβ3 in SMC cultured on different substances, fibronectin (FN), laminin (LN), Matrigel and without substance (C)
| FN | LN | Matrigel | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAK | 139.96 ± 14.68* | 86.39 ± 9.66 | 35.48 ± 9.51 |
| FAK(pY397) | 74.81 ± 8.05* | 40.97 ± 4.94 | 18.78 ± 8.06 |
| α5β1 | 65.65 ± 7.86* | 33.92 ± 5.08 | 6.95 ± 2.20 |
| αvβ3 | 45.91 ± 4.06* | 30.03 ± 2.91 | 8.57 ± 4.23 |
1-way ANOVA test
* P < 0.05 versus LN or Matrigel
Fig. 3Confocal micrographs of α5β1 and αvβ3 immunostaining in normal (NV), control (only ligation) (CLV), and AV-shunt (AV-S) collateral vessels. a–c: 5β1; d–f: αvβ3; a and d: NV; b and e: CLV, c and f: AV-S. Note that AV-S showed strong staining for both α5β1 and αvβ3
Fig. 4Confocal micrographs of α5β1 and αvβ3 immunostaining in SMC cultured on different substances. a–c: for α5β1; d–f: for αvβ3; a and d: on fibronectin; b and e: on laminin; c and f: inside Matrigel basement membrane matrix. Note that fibronectin was the strongest stimulator of expression of α5β1 and αvβ3. Note also that cells on fibronectin expressed high levels of α5β1 and αvβ3, whereas these were lowest on Matrigel
Fig. 5Representative micrographs of BrdU labeling in smooth muscle cells cultured on different substrates. a: on fibronectin; b: on laminin; c: inside Matrigel. Note that SMCs cultured on fibronectin showed high proliferation, whereas inside Matrigel there was no proliferation