Literature DB >> 18998112

Free versus forced exposure to an elevated plus-maze: evidence for new behavioral interpretations during test and retest.

Vincent Roy1, Pierre Chapillon, Mustapha Jeljeli, Jean Caston, Catherine Belzung.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The rodent elevated plus-maze is based on an approach/avoidance conflict between secure closed arms and aversive open arms that can be measured to assess anxiety. Despite this apparent simplicity, several discrepancies emerge from the interpretation of an animal's behavior in the maze, especially when considering the one-trial tolerance effect. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: In order to bring new elements of interpretation, we compared the behavior of rats exposed to the standard version of the test (forced exposure) to the behavior of rats that were allowed to freely explore the apparatus. We also compared the effects of testing/retesting and chlordiazepoxide in these two situations.
RESULTS: Our results confirm that open-arm avoidance is a natural tendency and therefore that it is not learned during initial exposure to the maze. In addition, comparison of the two situations suggests that some of the open-arm entries during a forced confrontation with the maze are better interpreted as attempts to avoid the whole situation, rather than as indications of a low level of anxiety. Finally, the one-trial tolerance effect was partially reduced in the free-exposure situation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results contradict the hypothesis that there is acquisition of a phobic-like response to open arms during trial 1. Rather, they are discussed in line with the hypotheses by Rodgers and Shepherd (Psychopharmacology (Berl) 113:237-242, 1993) and Bertoglio and Carobrez (Behav Brain Res 108:197-203, 2000) concerning the acquisition of spatial information about the whole apparatus, leading on trial 2 to an unbalanced approach/avoidance conflict and to the inefficiency of anxiolytic drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18998112     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-008-1378-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  45 in total

1.  The positive effects of postnatal handling on defensive burying are more obvious in a situation that enlarges the potential coping responses.

Authors:  Vincent Roy; Pierre Chapillon
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Effects of prenatal stress on anxiety and social interactions in adult rats.

Authors:  V Patin; B Lordi; A Vincent; J Caston
Journal:  Brain Res Dev Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-14

3.  A five minute experience in the elevated plus-maze alters the state of the benzodiazepine receptor in the dorsal raphe nucleus.

Authors:  L E Gonzalez; S E File
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modulation of plus-maze behaviour in mice by the preferential D3-receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT.

Authors:  R J Rodgers; N J Johnson; A J Champion; S Mills
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Prior maze experience required to alter midazolam effects in rats submitted to the elevated plus-maze.

Authors:  L J Bertoglio; A P Carobrez
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Corticosterone response to the plus-maze: high correlation with risk assessment in rats and mice.

Authors:  R J Rodgers; J Haller; A Holmes; J Halasz; T J Walton; P F Brain
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1999 Dec 1-15

7.  Resistance of experientially-induced changes in murine plus-maze behaviour to altered retest conditions.

Authors:  R J Rodgers; N J Johnson; J Carr; T P Hodgson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Open-field bheavior in the rat: what does it mean?

Authors:  V H Denenberg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1969-07-30       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  A comparison between Dark Agouti and Sprague-Dawley rats in their behaviour on the elevated plus-maze, open-field apparatus and activity meters, and their response to diazepam.

Authors:  Annis O Mechan; Paula M Moran; MartinJ Elliott; Andrew J Young; Michael H Joseph; RichardA Green
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-09-22       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  "One-trial tolerance" to the anxiolytic actions of benzodiazepines in the elevated plus-maze, or the development of a phobic state?

Authors:  S E File; H Zangrossi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  7 in total

1.  Female rats self-administer heroin by vapor inhalation.

Authors:  Arnold Gutierrez; Jacques D Nguyen; Kevin M Creehan; Michael A Taffe
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Effects of NMDA receptor blockade during the early development period on the retest performance of adult Wistar rats in the elevated plus maze.

Authors:  Sayad Kocahan; Kubra Akillioglu
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Low-anxiety rat phenotypes can be further reduced through genetic intervention.

Authors:  Gabriela Ferreira de Medeiros; Elayne Pereira; Natalli Granzotto; André Ramos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Behavior of Male and Female C57BL/6J Mice Is More Consistent with Repeated Trials in the Elevated Zero Maze than in the Elevated Plus Maze.

Authors:  Laura B Tucker; Joseph T McCabe
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Novelty and anxiolytic drugs dissociate two components of hippocampal theta in behaving rats.

Authors:  Christine E Wells; Doran P Amos; Ali Jeewajee; Vincent Douchamps; John Rodgers; John O'Keefe; Neil Burgess; Colin Lever
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Short and long term measures of anxiety exhibit opposite results.

Authors:  Ehud Fonio; Yoav Benjamini; Ilan Golani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Individual differences and the characterization of animal models of psychopathology: a strong challenge and a good opportunity.

Authors:  Antonio Armario; Roser Nadal
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.