Literature DB >> 18997666

Utility of bortezomib retreatment in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients: a multicenter case series.

Jeffrey Wolf1, Paul G Richardson, Michael Schuster, Annette LeBlanc, Ian B Walters, David S Battleman.   

Abstract

Bortezomib therapy has become an important part of the standard of care for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, and preliminary clinical evidence suggests that bortezomib retreatment in patients previously treated with the drug may prolong disease control. This retrospective study was designed to clarify the utility of bortezomib as a repeat therapy. We reviewed records from 3 major cancer centers that had participated in the phase II (SUMMIT or CREST) or phase III (APEX) registration studies to identify patients who were subsequently retreated off protocol with bortezomib-based therapy. We found 22 patients who received bortezomib retreatment following a 60 or more day gap between bortezomib treatments. Twelve patients had intervening therapy between initial bortezomib treatment and bortezomib retreatment. During retreatment, 14 of 22 patients received bortezomib in combination with another antineoplastic agent. The overall response rate for bortezomib retreatment was 50% (9% complete responses). The median length of retreatment was 5.1 months in responding patients and 2.4 months in nonresponding patients. Therapy was terminated due to unmanageable toxicity in 2 patients during retreatment, compared with 6 patients during initial treatment. During retreatment, no patients required dose reduction due to peripheral neuropathy, compared to 4 patients during their initial treatment. Thus, bortezomib retreatment appears to be safe and effective. Favorable observed response rates with bortezomib retreatment suggest that it may be a viable option for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, even in patients previously exposed to bortezomib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18997666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Adv Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1543-0790


  19 in total

1.  Discovery of novel covalent proteasome inhibitors through a combination of pharmacophore screening, covalent docking, and molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Aibo Li; Haopeng Sun; Lei Du; Xiaoxin Wu; Jianqin Cao; Qidong You; Yuyan Li
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  The Nuclear Factor (Erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 and Proteasome Maturation Protein Axis Mediate Bortezomib Resistance in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Bingzong Li; Jinxiang Fu; Ping Chen; Xueping Ge; Yali Li; Isere Kuiatse; Hua Wang; Huihan Wang; Xingding Zhang; Robert Z Orlowski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  The future of proteasome inhibitors in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Robert Z Orlowski
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.990

4.  Targeting the insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor to overcome bortezomib resistance in preclinical models of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Deborah J Kuhn; Zuzana Berkova; Richard J Jones; Richard Woessner; Chad C Bjorklund; Wencai Ma; R Eric Davis; Pei Lin; Hua Wang; Timothy L Madden; Caimiao Wei; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Michael Wang; Sheeba K Thomas; Jatin J Shah; Donna M Weber; Robert Z Orlowski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Endothelin-1 (ET-1) induces resistance to bortezomib in human multiple myeloma cells via a pathway involving the ETB receptor and upregulation of proteasomal activity.

Authors:  Maria Vaiou; Evanthia Pangou; Panagiotis Liakos; Nikos Sakellaridis; George Vassilopoulos; Konstantinos Dimas; Christos Papandreou
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Bortezomib: a review of its use in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Monique P Curran; Kate McKeage
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Screening a panel of drugs with diverse mechanisms of action yields potential therapeutic agents against neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Jinesh S Gheeya; Qing-Rong Chen; Christopher D Benjamin; Adam T Cheuk; Patricia Tsang; Joon-Yong Chung; Belhu B Metaferia; Thomas C Badgett; Peter Johansson; Jun S Wei; Stephen M Hewitt; Javed Khan
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2009-12-27       Impact factor: 4.742

8.  Multicenter, phase I, dose-escalation trial of lenalidomide plus bortezomib for relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Paul G Richardson; Edie Weller; Sundar Jagannath; David E Avigan; Melissa Alsina; Robert L Schlossman; Amitabha Mazumder; Nikhil C Munshi; Irene M Ghobrial; Deborah Doss; Diane L Warren; Laura E Lunde; Mary McKenney; Carol Delaney; Constantine S Mitsiades; Teru Hideshima; William Dalton; Robert Knight; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  A phase 2 trial of lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory myeloma.

Authors:  Paul G Richardson; Wanling Xie; Sundar Jagannath; Andrzej Jakubowiak; Sagar Lonial; Noopur S Raje; Melissa Alsina; Irene M Ghobrial; Robert L Schlossman; Nikhil C Munshi; Amitabha Mazumder; David H Vesole; Jonathan L Kaufman; Kathleen Colson; Mary McKenney; Laura E Lunde; John Feather; Michelle E Maglio; Diane Warren; Dixil Francis; Teru Hideshima; Robert Knight; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Constantine S Mitsiades; Edie Weller; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 10.  Programmed cell death pathways and current antitumor targets.

Authors:  Mei Lan Tan; Jer Ping Ooi; Nawfal Ismail; Ahmed Ismail Hassan Moad; Tengku Sifzizul Tengku Muhammad
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.