Literature DB >> 18997149

Bias: considerations for research practice.

Tobias Gerhard1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The concept of bias and its effects on study results are reviewed.
SUMMARY: Understanding bias is paramount for the conduct of sound research studies. In the context of research methodology, bias refers to the presence of systematic error in a study. This report serves as an introduction to the concept of bias and describes three major areas through which bias is introduced into research studies of health care interventions: (1) factors that relate to the exposure of patients to treatments in the population, (2) factors that influence inclusion of patients in the study, and (3) factors related to assessment and measurement. Methods to address bias in both design and analysis stages of a study are presented, including restriction, matching, multivariate analysis, instrumental variable estimation, and the prevention of misclassification of information. While some biases are specific to certain study designs and approaches, the general concepts of how bias is introduced into a study apply equally to randomized controlled trials, prospective observational or quasiexperimental studies, and retrospective studies. An important difference between the designs is how much opportunity the investigator has to avoid bias and influence accuracy of measurements, ranging from ideally full control in randomized controlled trials to almost no control in retrospective studies of automated databases.
CONCLUSION: Investigators should aim to avoid bias in the design of a study, adjust for bias in the study analysis if bias cannot feasibly be avoided, and quantify and discuss the effects of residual bias on study results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18997149     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp070369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  19 in total

1.  Development and Evaluation of the Curriculum for BOLD (Bronx Oncology Living Daily) Healthy Living: a Diabetes Prevention and Control Program for Underserved Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Beth A Conlon; Michelle Kahan; Melissa Martinez; Kathleen Isaac; Amerigo Rossi; Rebecca Skyhart; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Alyson Moadel-Robblee
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  The social responsiveness scale in relation to DSM IV and DSM5 ASD in Korean children.

Authors:  Keun-Ah Cheon; Jee-In Park; Yun-Joo Koh; Jungeun Song; Hyun-Joo Hong; Young-Kee Kim; Eun-Chung Lim; Hojang Kwon; Mina Ha; Myung-Ho Lim; Ki-Chung Paik; John N Constantino; Bennett Leventhal; Young Shin Kim
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 5.216

3.  Type 2 diabetes, smoking, insulin use, and mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma: a 12-year follow-up of a national cohort in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chin-Hsiao Tseng
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 6.047

4.  Association of Tramadol vs Codeine Prescription Dispensation With Mortality and Other Adverse Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Junqing Xie; Victoria Y Strauss; Daniel Martinez-Laguna; Cristina Carbonell-Abella; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Xavier Nogues; Gary S Collins; Sara Khalid; Antonella Delmestri; Aleksandra Turkiewicz; Martin Englund; Mina Tadrous; Carlen Reyes; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a multidisciplinary health-care model for patients with type-2 diabetes implemented in the public sector in Mexico: A quasi-experimental, retrospective evaluation.

Authors:  S G Sosa-Rubí; D Contreras-Loya; D Pedraza-Arizmendi; C Chivardi-Moreno; F Alarid-Escudero; R López-Ridaura; E Servan-Mori; V Molina-Cuevas; G Casales-Hernández; C Espinosa-López; J F González-Roldán; R Silva-Tinoco; J Seiglie; O Gómez-Dantés
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 5.602

6.  Methodological consequences of situation specificity: biases in assessments.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Patry
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-17

7.  Time to integrate oral health screening into medicine? A survey of primary care providers of older adults and an evidence-based rationale for integration.

Authors:  Lance T Vernon; Kathryn A Teng; David C Kaelber; Gregory P Heintschel; Suchitra Nelson
Journal:  Gerodontology       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.750

8.  Effectiveness and Tolerability of Different Recommended Doses of PPIs and H2RAs in GERD: Network Meta-Analysis and GRADE system.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Joey S W Kwong; Rui-Xia Yuan; Hao Chen; Chang Xu; Yi-Pin Wang; Gong-Li Yang; Jin-Zhu Yan; Le Peng; Xian-Tao Zeng; Hong Weng; Jie Luo; Yu-Ming Niu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods.

Authors:  Alaa Althubaiti
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-05-04

Review 10.  Quality Reporting of Multivariable Regression Models in Observational Studies: Review of a Representative Sample of Articles Published in Biomedical Journals.

Authors:  Jordi Real; Carles Forné; Albert Roso-Llorach; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.