UNLABELLED: We evaluated the effects on the absorbed dose to thyroid follicular cells of self-absorption of (131)I radiation (specifically, beta-rays) in the follicular colloid. METHODS: Thyroid follicles were modeled as colloid-filled spheres, containing a uniform concentration of (131)I and surrounded by a concentric monolayer of cells. Assuming close packing of identical follicles, we used Monte Carlo simulation to assess the absorbed dose to follicular cells. RESULTS: Because of beta-ray self-absorption in colloidal spheres with radii larger than 50 mum, the absorbed dose to follicular cells is less than the average thyroid absorbed dose. CONCLUSION: For the same thyroid mass, radioiodine thyroid uptake, and effective half-life, patients with follicles with colloidal sphere radii of 100, 200, 300, and 400 microm should be administered 9%, 15%, 21%, and 30% more (131)I, respectively, than patients with colloidal sphere radii of less than 50 microm, to yield the same absorbed dose to follicular cells.
UNLABELLED: We evaluated the effects on the absorbed dose to thyroid follicular cells of self-absorption of (131)I radiation (specifically, beta-rays) in the follicular colloid. METHODS: Thyroid follicles were modeled as colloid-filled spheres, containing a uniform concentration of (131)I and surrounded by a concentric monolayer of cells. Assuming close packing of identical follicles, we used Monte Carlo simulation to assess the absorbed dose to follicular cells. RESULTS: Because of beta-ray self-absorption in colloidal spheres with radii larger than 50 mum, the absorbed dose to follicular cells is less than the average thyroid absorbed dose. CONCLUSION: For the same thyroid mass, radioiodine thyroid uptake, and effective half-life, patients with follicles with colloidal sphere radii of 100, 200, 300, and 400 microm should be administered 9%, 15%, 21%, and 30% more (131)I, respectively, than patients with colloidal sphere radii of less than 50 microm, to yield the same absorbed dose to follicular cells.
Authors: S J Bonnema; S Fast; V E Nielsen; H Boel-Jørgensen; P Grupe; P B Andersen; L Hegedüs Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 4.256