Literature DB >> 18996751

Five-year outcome with gastric bypass: Roux limb length makes a difference.

John J Gleysteen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical reports have indicated that longer Roux limbs (150 cm) have greater or no effect on long-term weight loss in super-obese patients (body mass index [BMI]>or=50 kg/m2) and little effect in less obese patients.
METHODS: The weight loss outcomes through 5 years were compared in 3 sequential groups of patients, who underwent gastric bypass by 1 surgeon, and in whom the Roux limb lengths were different. Comparisons were made between 2 cohorts: those with a BMI of <50 (morbid obesity [MO]) and those with a BMI>or=50 kg/m2 (super obesity [SO]). Three groups of patients stratified by Roux limb lengths were compared: group 1, 41-61-cm Roux limb; group 2, 130-160-cm Roux limb; and group 3, 115-250-cm Roux limb (one third of small bowel). All comparisons were made using 2-way analysis of variance, and the interaction terms were not significant.
RESULTS: A comparable number of patients were in each group, and the average preoperative weights were similar; however, more than twice as many patients in groups 2 and 3 were SO than MO. The BMI loss and weight loss were similar in each group. The greater BMI cohort (SO) lost more weight than did the MO cohort (P<.001). The BMI change and weight change in the shorter Roux limb group were less than those in groups 2 or 3 (longer Roux limbs; P<.01-.05). This difference was established with the BMI by 18 months. The BMI change and weight loss were not different between groups 2 and 3, presumably because their mean Roux limb lengths were not different. A limited amount of weight gain or recidivism occurred in patients with 5 years of follow-up, and it was not different among the 3 groups.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study have shown that longer Roux limbs improve weight loss outcomes both early and late in SO patients but not in MO patients. Clinically used long lengths of Roux limbs are close enough to one third of the total small bowel length such that the weight outcomes were not different, and total length should not need to be measured operatively. The eventual changes attributed to recidivism were not affected by the Roux limb length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18996751     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2008.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  23 in total

1.  Accuracy and inter-operator variability of small bowel length measurement at laparoscopy.

Authors:  Benny Gazer; Danny Rosin; Barak Bar-Zakai; Udi Willenz; Ofer Doron; Mordechai Gutman; Avinoam Nevler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is weight loss better sustained with long-limb gastric bypass in the super-obese?

Authors:  Mohammad Sarhan; Jenny J Choi; Monqidh Al Sawwaf; Ghulam Murtaza; Jorge L Zelada Getty; Leaque Ahmed
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Conventional Versus Distal Laparoscopic One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Trial with 1-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Tamer M Nabil; Ahmed H Khalil; Sameh Mikhail; Salah S Soliman; Mostafa Aziz; Halepian Antoine
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Optimization of a Technique to Standardize the Rodent Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Model and Troubleshooting of Postoperative Failures.

Authors:  Qingbo Wang; Geng Wang; Chaojie Hu; Jinpeng Du; Jie Bai; Miaomiao Peng; Ning Zhao; Yu Wang; Kaixiong Tao; Guobin Wang; Zefeng Xia
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  In Reply to the Invitation from the Editor to the Letter "What Is the Current Evidence to Define the Length of the Alimentary Limb in the Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Technique?"

Authors:  Yingjin Wang; Chen Xie; Xiaodong Zhou
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Biliopancreatic diversion with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and long limbs: advances in surgical treatment for super-obesity.

Authors:  Fotis Kalfarentzos; George Skroubis; Stavros Karamanakos; Marianna Argentou; Nancy Mead; Ioannis Kehagias; Theodore K Alexandrides
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 7.  The importance of the length of the limbs for gastric bypass patients--an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Timothy S Kuwada; Keith S Gersin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  A Meta-Analysis of GLP-1 After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: Impact of Surgical Technique and Measurement Strategy.

Authors:  Pichamol Jirapinyo; David X Jin; Taha Qazi; Nitin Mishra; Christopher C Thompson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Proximal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Addressing the myth of limb length.

Authors:  Bestoun Ahmed; Wendy C King; William Gourash; Amanda Hinerman; Steven H Belle; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Anita P Courcoulas
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Small Bowel Limb Lengths and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kamal K Mahawar; Parveen Kumar; Chetan Parmar; Yitka Graham; William R J Carr; Neil Jennings; Norbert Schroeder; Shlok Balupuri; Peter K Small
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.