Literature DB >> 18996608

Calculating concentration index with repetitive values of indicators of economic welfare.

Zhuo Chen1, Kakoli Roy.   

Abstract

Repetitive values of the ranking indicators of economic welfare are often introduced due to incidental ties or censoring in the welfare variable, or the categorical nature of welfare variables used in numerous national surveys. In calculating concentration index (CI), assigning different fractional ranks to observations that have same values of the welfare measure leads to unstable and inconsistent CI estimates when the welfare variable is categorical or censored. In this paper, we establish an interval within which the CI estimates lie, and propose a solution, which is an extension of (Kakwani, N.C., Wagstaff, A., van Doorslaer, E., 1997. Socioeconomic inequalities in health: measurement, computation, and statistical inference. Journal of Econometrics 77, 87-103), for consistent and replicable estimates of CI when there are a substantial number of ties of the welfare indicator.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18996608     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  14 in total

1.  Analysis of socioeconomic health inequalities using the concentration index.

Authors:  Peter Konings; Sam Harper; John Lynch; Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor; Dirk Berkvens; Vincent Lorant; Andrea Geckova; Niko Speybroeck
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Improving equity in health care financing in China during the progression towards Universal Health Coverage.

Authors:  Mingsheng Chen; Andrew J Palmer; Lei Si
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Socioeconomic disparities in the global burden of glaucoma: an analysis of trends from 1990 to 2016.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Xiaoning Yu; Xiyuan Ping; Xiayan Xu; Yilei Cui; Hao Yang; Jiayue Zhou; Qichuan Yin; Xingchao Shentu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  A Monte Carlo method to estimate the confidence intervals for the concentration index using aggregated population register data.

Authors:  Sonja Lumme; Reijo Sund; Alastair H Leyland; Ilmo Keskimäki
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2015-02-18

5.  Access disparity and health inequality of the elderly: unmet needs and delayed healthcare.

Authors:  Tetsuji Yamada; Chia-Ching Chen; Chiyoe Murata; Hiroshi Hirai; Toshiyuki Ojima; Katsunori Kondo; Joseph R Harris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Has equity in government subsidy on healthcare improved in China? Evidence from the China's National Health Services Survey.

Authors:  Lei Si; Mingsheng Chen; Andrew J Palmer
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2017-01-10

7.  The less healthy urban population: income-related health inequality in China.

Authors:  Wei Yang; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  China's new cooperative medical scheme and equity in access to health care: evidence from a longitudinal household survey.

Authors:  Wei Yang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2013-03-23

9.  Assessing equity in benefit distribution of government health subsidy in 2012 across East China: benefit incidence analysis.

Authors:  Mingsheng Chen; Andrew J Palmer; Lei Si
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2016-01-20

10.  The association between education and induced abortion for three cohorts of adults in Finland.

Authors:  Heini Väisänen
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2015-10-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.