Literature DB >> 18992288

Neural correlates of the judgment of lying: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Tokiko Harada1, Shoji Itakura, Fen Xu, Kang Lee, Satoru Nakashita, Daisuke N Saito, Norihiro Sadato.   

Abstract

Lie judgment is an estimation of the speaker's intention to deceive inevitably accompanied by moral judgment. To depict their neural substrates, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Eighteen subjects read short stories and made judgments in three different tasks: a control gender judgment task, a moral judgment task, and a lie judgment task. Compared with the control task, both the moral and lie judgment tasks activated the left temporal lobe, the medial prefrontal cortex, the lateral orbitofrontal cortex extending to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the caudate nucleus, the left temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), and the right cerebellum. Neural activations were greater in the left middle frontal gyrus, the bilateral TPJ, and the right superior temporal sulcus in the lie judgment condition than in the moral judgment condition. In addition, the left TPJ showed greater activation when a protagonist told lies for anti-social rather than pro-social purposes. These data suggest that the judgment of lies is mediated by the neural substrates of moral judgment (conventionality) and those involved in detecting the intent to deceive (intentionality), and that the left TPJ might play a key role in processing both the conventional and the intentional information involved in the judgment of lying.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18992288     DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2008.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Res        ISSN: 0168-0102            Impact factor:   3.304


  15 in total

1.  Neural correlates of explicit social judgments on vocal stimuli.

Authors:  Lukas Hensel; Danilo Bzdok; Veronika I Müller; Karl Zilles; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Neural systems for evaluating speaker (Un)believability.

Authors:  Xiaoming Jiang; Ryan Sanford; Marc D Pell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Morality: incomplete without the cerebellum?

Authors:  Asli Demirtas-Tatlidede; Jeremy D Schmahmann
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Comprehension of insincere communication in neurodegenerative disease: lies, sarcasm, and theory of mind.

Authors:  Tal Shany-Ur; Pardis Poorzand; Scott N Grossman; Matthew E Growdon; Jung Y Jang; Robin S Ketelle; Bruce L Miller; Katherine P Rankin
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  White matter tracts critical for recognition of sarcasm.

Authors:  Cameron L Davis; Kenichi Oishi; Andreia V Faria; John Hsu; Yessenia Gomez; Susumu Mori; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 0.881

6.  Efforts for the Correct Comprehension of Deceitful and Ironic Communicative Intentions in Schizophrenia: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Role of the Left Middle Temporal Gyrus.

Authors:  R Morese; C Brasso; M Stanziano; A Parola; M C Valentini; F M Bosco; P Rocca
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-14

7.  Neural mechanisms of deception in a social context: an fMRI replication study.

Authors:  Maya Zheltyakova; Maxim Kireev; Alexander Korotkov; Svyatoslav Medvedev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Exploring Age-Related Changes in Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Amygdala: From Young to Middle Adulthood.

Authors:  Ting Xiao; Sheng Zhang; Lue-En Lee; Herta H Chao; Christopher van Dyck; Chiang-Shan R Li
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 9.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of theory of mind impairment in neurodegeneration: a transdiagnostic approach.

Authors:  Cherie Strikwerda-Brown; Siddharth Ramanan; Muireann Irish
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.570

Review 10.  How does morality work in the brain? A functional and structural perspective of moral behavior.

Authors:  Leo Pascual; Paulo Rodrigues; David Gallardo-Pujol
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.