Literature DB >> 18992075

DNA status on thawed semen from fighting bull: a comparison between the SCD and the SCSA tests.

F Martínez-Pastor1, M R Fernández-Santos, M del Rocío Fernández-Santos, A E Domínguez-Rebolledo, M C Esteso, J J Garde.   

Abstract

The assessment of sperm chromatin status is compulsory in a complete spermiogram. Here we applied the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) and the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test to assess the chromatin status of three fighting bulls. Cryopreserved semen (two straws/bull) were analysed by duplicate after thawing and after 6 h at 37 degrees C with and without oxidative stress (1 mm FE(2+)). Results (SCD: percentage of spermatozoa with halo; SCSA: SD-DFI, %DFI and HDS) were analysed for differences between bulls and treatments, sensitivity and specificity (receiver operating characteristic curves) and repeatability (repeatability coefficients as 2SD of duplicate differences).%DFI for the three bulls was below 2% at 0 h, indicating no risk for fertility according to previous reports. It increased slightly for two of the bulls after FE(2+) treatment (%DFI < 5%) and more pronouncedly for the other bull (C, %DFI approximately 10%), which merits further investigation. SCD rendered higher percentage of halos for bull C, but could not discriminate between samples with and without oxidizing treatment (AUC: 0.52). SCSA (%DFI) showed a high discriminating ability between treatments (AUC: 0.96). The repeatability coefficient was also higher for SCD (5.9) than for %DFI (1.8), indicating lower repeatability for SCD. Overall, %DFI might be the most useful parameter for assessing sperm chromatin on fighting bull. SCD might yield different information than SCSA, hence further research is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18992075     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01098.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Domest Anim        ISSN: 0936-6768            Impact factor:   2.005


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of four methods to evaluate sperm DNA integrity between mouse caput and cauda epididymidis.

Authors:  Serafín Pérez-Cerezales; Alberto Miranda; Alfonso Gutiérrez-Adán
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  Nuclear DNA Fragmentation in Boar Spermatozoa: Measurement Methods and Reproductive Performance Implications.

Authors:  Raquel Ausejo; Juan Manuel Martínez; Noelia Mendoza; Alfonso Bolarin; M Teresa Tejedor; Maria Victoria Falceto
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-30

3.  Seasonal Changes of Nuclear DNA Fragmentation in Boar Spermatozoa in Spain.

Authors:  Raquel Ausejo; Juan Manuel Martínez; Pedro Soler-Llorens; Alfonso Bolarín; Teresa Tejedor; María Victoria Falceto
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on clinical outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer and on blastocyst formation.

Authors:  Wuhua Ni; Shiquan Xiao; Xiufang Qiu; Jianyuan Jin; Chengshuang Pan; Yan Li; Qianjin Fei; Xu Yang; Liya Zhang; Xuefeng Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Relationship between the Testicular Blood Flow and the Semen Parameters of Rams during the Selected Periods of the Breeding and Non-Breeding Seasons.

Authors:  Natalia Kozłowska; Ricardo Faundez; Kamil Borzyszkowski; Sebastian Dąbrowski; Tomasz Jasiński; Małgorzata Domino
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 2.752

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.