Literature DB >> 18991504

Trends in the incidence of surgical site infection in the Netherlands.

Judith Manniën1, Susan van den Hof, Jan Muilwijk, Peterhans J van den Broek, Birgit van Benthem, Jan C Wille.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time trend in the surgical site infection (SSI) rate in relation to the duration of surveillance in The Netherlands.
SETTING: Forty-two hospitals that participated in the the Dutch national nosocomial surveillance network, which is known as PREZIES (Preventie van Ziekenhuisinfecties door Surveillance), and that registered at least 1 of the following 5 frequently performed surgical procedures for at least 3 years during the period from 1996 through 2006: mastectomy, colectomy, replacement of the head of the femur, total hip arthroplasty, or knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: Analyses were performed for each surgical procedure. The surveillance time to operation was stratified in consecutive 1-year periods, with the first year as reference. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using a random coefficient model to adjust for random variation among hospitals. All models were adjusted for method of postdischarge surveillance.
RESULTS: The number of procedures varied from 3,031 for colectomy to 31,407 for total hip arthroplasty, and the SSI rate varied from 1.6% for knee arthroplasty to 12.2% for colectomy. For total hip arthroplasty, the SSI rate decreased significantly by 6% per year of surveillance (odds ratio [OR], 0.94 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.90-0.98]), indicating a 60% decrease after 10 years. Nonsignificant but substantial decreasing trends in the rate of SSI were found for replacement of the head of the femur (OR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.88-1.00]) and for colectomy (OR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.83-1.02]).
CONCLUSIONS: Even though most decreasing trends in the SSI rate were not statistically significant, they were encouraging. To use limited resources as efficiently as possible, we would suggest switching the surveillance to another surgical procedure when the SSI rate for that particular procedure has decreased below the target rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18991504     DOI: 10.1086/592094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol        ISSN: 0899-823X            Impact factor:   3.254


  10 in total

1.  Joint prosthetic infections: a success story or a continuous concern?

Authors:  Geert H I M Walenkamp
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Increasing risk of revision due to deep infection after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Håvard Dale; Geir Hallan; Geir Hallan; Birgitte Espehaug; Leif I Havelin; Lars B Engesaeter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Prevention of hospital infections by intervention and training (PROHIBIT): results of a pan-European cluster-randomized multicentre study to reduce central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Tjallie van der Kooi; Hugo Sax; Didier Pittet; Jaap van Dissel; Birgit van Benthem; Bernhard Walder; Vanessa Cartier; Lauren Clack; Sabine de Greeff; Martin Wolkewitz; Stefanie Hieke; Hendriek Boshuizen; Jan van de Kassteele; Annemie Van den Abeele; Teck Wee Boo; Magda Diab-Elschahawi; Uga Dumpis; Camelia Ghita; Susan FitzGerald; Tatjana Lejko; Kris Leleu; Mercedes Palomar Martinez; Olga Paniara; Márta Patyi; Paweł Schab; Annibale Raglio; Emese Szilágyi; Mirosław Ziętkiewicz; Albert W Wu; Hajo Grundmann; Walter Zingg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis use in elective orthopaedic surgery - a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Felix Rohrer; Anita Maurer; Hubert Noetzli; Brigitta Gahl; Andreas Limacher; Tanja Hermann; Jan Bruegger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Infection after primary hip arthroplasty: a comparison of 3 Norwegian health registers.

Authors:  Håvard Dale; Inge Skråmm; Hege L Løwer; Hanne M Eriksen; Birgitte Espehaug; Ove Furnes; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Leif I Havelin; Lars B Engesaeter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Hip and knee arthroplasty: quo vadis?

Authors:  Jeffery Ho; Jacques F Meis; Marrigje Nabuurs-Franssen; Andreas Voss
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.887

7.  Incidence of surgical site infections cannot be derived reliably from point prevalence survey data in Dutch hospitals.

Authors:  A P Meijs; J A Ferreira; S C DE Greeff; M C Vos; M B G Koek
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 8.  Beyond the operating room: do hospital characteristics have an impact on surgical site infections after colorectal surgery? A systematic review.

Authors:  Rui Malheiro; Bárbara Peleteiro; Sofia Correia
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.887

9.  Increasing risk of prosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Håvard Dale; Anne M Fenstad; Geir Hallan; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes; Søren Overgaard; Alma B Pedersen; Johan Kärrholm; Göran Garellick; Pekka Pulkkinen; Antti Eskelinen; Keijo Mäkelä; Lars B Engesæter
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Decreased rate of surgical site infection after spinal surgery with instrumentation using bundled approach including surveillance and intrawound vancomycin application.

Authors:  Takashi Sono; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Masanori Izeki; Yu Shimizu; Kazutaka Masamoto; Kazuaki Morizane; Bungo Otsuki; Shimei Tanida; Miki Nagao; Satoshi Ichiyama; Shuichi Matsuda
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.