Literature DB >> 18990767

Enterolactone is differently associated with estrogen receptor beta-negative and -positive breast cancer in a Swedish nested case-control study.

Emily Sonestedt1, Signe Borgquist, Ulrika Ericson, Bo Gullberg, Håkan Olsson, Herman Adlercreutz, Göran Landberg, Elisabet Wirfält.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differences in the estrogen receptor (ER) status of tumors may explain ambiguities in epidemiologic studies between the blood concentrations of enterolactone and breast cancer. To our knowledge, the association between enterolactone and ERbeta-defined breast cancer has previously not been examined.
METHODS: A nested case-control study within the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort used 366 cases and 733 matched controls to identify the major determinants of plasma enterolactone and to examine the association between enterolactone concentration and breast cancer risk and if this association differs depending on the ERalpha and ERbeta status of tumors. A modified diet history method assessed dietary habits. Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay determined enterolactone concentrations and immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray determined ER status.
RESULTS: Dietary fiber, as well as fruits and berries, and high-fiber bread showed statistically significant correlations with enterolactone (r, 0.13-0.22). Smoking and obesity were associated with lower enterolactone concentrations. Enterolactone concentrations above the median (16 nmol/L) were associated with reduced breast cancer risk when compared with those below [odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.58-0.98]. The reduced risk was only observed for ERalpha [positive (+); odds ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.97] and ERbeta [negative (-)] tumors (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42-0.84), with significantly different risks for ERbeta (-) and ERbeta (+) tumors (P for heterogeneity = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the suggestion that enterolactone is a biomarker of a healthy lifestyle. The protective association between enterolactone and breast cancer was significantly different between ERbeta (-) and ERbeta (+) tumors and most evident in tumors that express ERalpha but not ERbeta.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18990767     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  11 in total

1.  Reduction in Ki-67 in benign breast tissue of high-risk women with the lignan secoisolariciresinol diglycoside.

Authors:  Carol J Fabian; Bruce F Kimler; Carola M Zalles; Jennifer R Klemp; Brian K Petroff; Qamar J Khan; Priyanka Sharma; Kenneth D R Setchell; Xueheng Zhao; Teresa A Phillips; Trina Metheny; Jennifer R Hughes; Hung-Wen Yeh; Karen A Johnson
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2010-08-19

Review 2.  Anticancer and antimetastatic potential of enterolactone: Clinical, preclinical and mechanistic perspectives.

Authors:  Aniket V Mali; Subhash B Padhye; Shrikant Anant; Mahabaleshwar V Hegde; Shivajirao S Kadam
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  Distinct signatures of host-microbial meta-metabolome and gut microbiome in two C57BL/6 strains under high-fat diet.

Authors:  Alesia Walker; Barbara Pfitzner; Susanne Neschen; Melanie Kahle; Mourad Harir; Marianna Lucio; Franco Moritz; Dimitrios Tziotis; Michael Witting; Michael Rothballer; Marion Engel; Michael Schmid; David Endesfelder; Martin Klingenspor; Thomas Rattei; Wolfgang Zu Castell; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Anton Hartmann; Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Genetic Variation in Steroid and Xenobiotic Metabolizing Pathways and Enterolactone Excretion Before and After Flaxseed Intervention in African American and European American Women.

Authors:  Huiru Chang; Song Yao; David Tritchler; Meredith A Hullar; Johanna W Lampe; Lilian U Thompson; Susan E McCann
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Plasma enterolactone and breast cancer risk in the Nurses' Health Study II.

Authors:  Jing Xie; Shelley S Tworoger; Adrian A Franke; Kathryn L Terry; Megan S Rice; Bernard A Rosner; Walter C Willett; Susan E Hankinson; A Heather Eliassen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Can rye intake decrease risk of human breast cancer?

Authors:  Herman Adlercreutz
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 7.  Factors Explaining Interpersonal Variation in Plasma Enterolactone Concentrations in Humans.

Authors:  Elin Hålldin; Anne Kirstine Eriksen; Carl Brunius; Andreia Bento da Silva; Maria Bronze; Kati Hanhineva; Anna-Marja Aura; Rikard Landberg
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 8.  Biomarkers of cereal food intake.

Authors:  Rikard Landberg; Kati Hanhineva; Kieran Tuohy; Mar Garcia-Aloy; Izabela Biskup; Rafael Llorach; Xiaofei Yin; Lorraine Brennan; Marjukka Kolehmainen
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 5.523

9.  Higher frequency of dairy intake is associated with a reduced risk of breast cancer: Results from a case-control study in Northern and Eastern China.

Authors:  Lixiang Yu; Liyuan Liu; Fei Wang; Fei Zhou; Yujuan Xiang; Shuya Huang; Gengshen Yin; Yingjie Zhuo; Zhongbing Ma; Qiang Zhang; Zhigang Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Plasma enterolactone and risk of prostate cancer in middle-aged Swedish men.

Authors:  Peter Wallström; Isabel Drake; Emily Sonestedt; Bo Gullberg; Anders Bjartell; Håkan Olsson; Herman Adlercreutz; Matti J Tikkanen; Elisabet Wirfält
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 5.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.