Literature DB >> 18990531

Safety and efficacy of intravenous tigecycline in treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: results from a double-blind randomized phase 3 comparison study with levofloxacin.

Carlos Bergallo1, Abel Jasovich, Osvaldo Teglia, Maria Eugenia Oliva, Arnold Lentnek, Luisa de Wouters, Juan Carlos Zlocowski, Gary Dukart, Angel Cooper, Rajiv Mallick.   

Abstract

Tigecycline exhibits potent in vitro activity against many community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant ones. Its spectrum of activity and ability to penetrate lung tissue suggest it may be effective for hospitalized CAP patients. Hospitalized CAP patients (n=418) were randomized to receive intravenous (i.v.) tigecycline or levofloxacin. Patients could be switched to oral levofloxacin after receiving 6 or more doses of i.v. study medication. Therapy duration was 7 to 14 days. Coprimary efficacy end points were clinical responses in the clinically evaluable (CE: tigecycline, n=138; levofloxacin, n=156) and clinical modified intent-to-treat (c-mITT: tigecycline, n=191; levofloxacin, n=203) populations at test-of-cure (TOC). Safety was assessed in the mITT population (tigecycline, n=208; levofloxacin, n=210). Cure rates in tigecycline and levofloxacin groups were comparable in CE (90.6% versus 87.2%, respectively) and c-mITT (78% versus 77.8%, respectively) populations at TOC. Nausea and vomiting occurred in significantly more tigecycline-treated patients; elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were reported in significantly more levofloxacin-treated patients. There were no significant differences in hospital length of stay, median duration of i.v. or oral antibiotic treatments, hospital readmissions, or number of patients switched to oral levofloxacin. Tigecycline was safe, effective, and noninferior to levofloxacin in hospitalized patients with CAP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18990531     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  29 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of tigecycline for treatment of infectious disease.

Authors:  Yun Cai; Rui Wang; Beibei Liang; Nan Bai; Youning Liu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections--full version.

Authors:  M Woodhead; F Blasi; S Ewig; J Garau; G Huchon; M Ieven; A Ortqvist; T Schaberg; A Torres; G van der Heijden; R Read; T J M Verheij
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 3.  Assessment of bias in outcomes reported in trials on pneumonia: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Avni; S Shiber-Ofer; L Leibovici; M Paul
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Clarification to the systematic review and meta-analysis involving tigecycline.

Authors:  Paul McGovern; Timothy Babinchak; Alvaro Quintana
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Randomized phase 2 trial to evaluate the clinical efficacy of two high-dosage tigecycline regimens versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Julio Ramirez; Nathalie Dartois; Hassan Gandjini; Jean Li Yan; Joan Korth-Bradley; Paul C McGovern
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Efficacy of tigecycline for secondary Acinetobacter bacteremia and factors associated with treatment failure.

Authors:  Bo-Huang Liou; Yi-Tzu Lee; Shu-Chen Kuo; Po-Yu Liu; Chang-Phone Fung
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Busting the Myth of "Static vs Cidal": A Systemic Literature Review.

Authors:  Noah Wald-Dickler; Paul Holtom; Brad Spellberg
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  High dose of tigecycline for extremely resistant Gram-negative pneumonia: yes, we can.

Authors:  José Garnacho-Montero; Carmen Ferrándiz-Millón
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Newer antibacterial drugs for a new century.

Authors:  Gina Devasahayam; William M Scheld; Paul S Hoffman
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.206

10.  Tigecycline does not prolong corrected QT intervals in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Joan M Korth-Bradley; Paul C McGovern; Joanne Salageanu; Kyle Matschke; Anna Plotka; Sylvester Pawlak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.