BACKGROUND: In epidemiology, it always has been important to study local area patterns of disease occurrence. New methods to quantify local area and household clustering of disease emerged late in the 19th century and were refined during the 20th century. Nonetheless, multi-level models to estimate local area clustering of illegal drug use did not appear until the 1990s, and to date, there is just one study with estimates of local neighbourhood clustering of cannabis use, based on a United States sample. Here, seeking the first replication of that single prior study, we estimate the degree to which cannabis use might cluster within neighbourhoods of New Zealand (NZ), and we also study higher level clustering and suspected individual-level determinants of recent cannabis use. METHODS: A national probability community sample (n=12,992) of adults aged 16 years or more with standardized assessment of cannabis use. Alternating logistic regression produced estimates for cannabis clustering. RESULTS: In NZ, use of cannabis was common: 41.6% had ever used it and 13.1% had used it in the past year. There was clustering within the smallest local areas (pairwise odds ratio=1.3-1.5) but not within larger government districts (PWOR=1.02). Age, male sex, ethnicity, education, and marital status were all associated with cannabis use, but did not account for observed clustering. CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood clustering of recent cannabis use has emerged in New Zealand, as in the US. Standard individual-level characteristics explain only some of this clustering. Other explanations must be sought, perhaps including personal networks and local supply.
BACKGROUND: In epidemiology, it always has been important to study local area patterns of disease occurrence. New methods to quantify local area and household clustering of disease emerged late in the 19th century and were refined during the 20th century. Nonetheless, multi-level models to estimate local area clustering of illegal drug use did not appear until the 1990s, and to date, there is just one study with estimates of local neighbourhood clustering of cannabis use, based on a United States sample. Here, seeking the first replication of that single prior study, we estimate the degree to which cannabis use might cluster within neighbourhoods of New Zealand (NZ), and we also study higher level clustering and suspected individual-level determinants of recent cannabis use. METHODS: A national probability community sample (n=12,992) of adults aged 16 years or more with standardized assessment of cannabis use. Alternating logistic regression produced estimates for cannabis clustering. RESULTS: In NZ, use of cannabis was common: 41.6% had ever used it and 13.1% had used it in the past year. There was clustering within the smallest local areas (pairwise odds ratio=1.3-1.5) but not within larger government districts (PWOR=1.02). Age, male sex, ethnicity, education, and marital status were all associated with cannabis use, but did not account for observed clustering. CONCLUSIONS: Neighborhood clustering of recent cannabis use has emerged in New Zealand, as in the US. Standard individual-level characteristics explain only some of this clustering. Other explanations must be sought, perhaps including personal networks and local supply.
Authors: Louisa Degenhardt; Wai Tat Chiu; Nancy Sampson; Ronald C Kessler; James C Anthony Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2007-05-03 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Ron de Graaf; Mirjana Radovanovic; Margriet van Laar; Brian Fairman; Louisa Degenhardt; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Ronny Bruffaerts; Giovanni de Girolamo; John Fayyad; Oye Gureje; Josep Maria Haro; Yueqin Huang; Stanislav Kostychenko; Jean-Pierre Lépine; Herbert Matschinger; Maria Elena Medina Mora; Yehuda Neumark; Johan Ormel; Jose Posada-Villa; Dan J Stein; Hisateru Tachimori; J Elisabeth Wells; James C Anthony Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Beth A Reboussin; Adam J Milam; Kerry M Green; Nicholas S Ialongo; C Debra M Furr-Holden Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Katherine M Keyes; John E Schulenberg; Patrick M O'Malley; Lloyd D Johnston; Jerald G Bachman; Guohua Li; Deborah Hasin Journal: Addiction Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 6.526