Literature DB >> 18990504

Phase III multi-institutional trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel, estramustine, and oral etoposide combined with long-term androgen suppression therapy and radiotherapy versus long-term androgen suppression plus radiotherapy alone for high-risk prostate cancer: preliminary toxicity analysis of RTOG 99-02.

Seth A Rosenthal1, Kyoungwha Bae, Kenneth J Pienta, Mark L Sobczak, Sucha O Asbell, Raghu Rajan, Kevin J Kerlin, Jeff M Michalski, Howard M Sandler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Long-term androgen suppression plus radiotherapy (AS+RT) is standard treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. A randomized trial, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 9902, was undertaken to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel, estramustine, and etoposide (TEE) plus AS+RT would improve disease outcomes with acceptable toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: High-risk (prostate-specific antigen 20-100 ng/mL and Gleason score >or=7; or Stage T2 or greater, Gleason score 8, prostate-specific antigen level <100 ng/mL) nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients were randomized to AS+RT (Arm 1) vs. AS+RT plus four cycles of TEE (Arm 2). TEE was delivered 4 weeks after RT. AS continued for 2 years for both treatment arms. RT began after 8 weeks of AS began.
RESULTS: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9902 trial opened January 11, 2000. Excess thromboembolic toxicity was noted, leading to study closure October 4, 2004. A total of 397 patients were accrued, and the data for 381 were analyzable. An acute and long-term toxicity analysis was performed. The worst overall toxicities during treatment were increased for Arm 2. Of the 192 patients, 136 (71%) on Arm 2 had RTOG Grade 3 or greater toxicity compared with 70 (37%) of 189 patients on Arm 1. Statistically significant increases in hematologic toxicity (p < 0.0001) and gastrointestinal toxicity (p = 0.017) but not genitourinary toxicity (p = 0.07) were noted during treatment. Two Grade 5 complications related to neutropenic infection occurred in Arm 2. Three cases of myelodysplasia/acute myelogenous leukemia were noted in Arm 2. At 2 and 3 years after therapy completion, excess long-term toxicity was not observed in Arm 2.
CONCLUSION: TEE was associated with significantly increased toxicity during treatment. The toxicity profiles did not differ at 2 and 3 years after therapy. Toxicity is an important consideration in the design of trials using adjuvant chemotherapy for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18990504     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

1.  Prostate cancer: No evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk disease.

Authors:  Peter Albers
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Long-term follow-up of prostate cancer patients treated with vaccine and definitive radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Kamrava; A H Kesarwala; R A Madan; E Lita; A Kaushal; K-Y Tsang; D J Poole; S M Steinberg; T Ferrara; W Dahut; J Schlom; J L Gulley
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 3.  Innovations in the systemic therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dale R Shepard; Derek Raghavan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Analysis of the genomic response of human prostate cancer cells to histone deacetylase inhibitors.

Authors:  Madeleine S Q Kortenhorst; Michel D Wissing; Ronald Rodríguez; Sushant K Kachhap; Judith J M Jans; Petra Van der Groep; Henk M W Verheul; Anuj Gupta; Paul O Aiyetan; Elsken van der Wall; Michael A Carducci; Paul J Van Diest; Luigi Marchionni
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 5.  Docetaxel in prostate cancer: a familiar face as the new standard in a hormone-sensitive setting.

Authors:  Javier Puente; Enrique Grande; Ana Medina; Pablo Maroto; Nuria Lainez; Jose Angel Arranz
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 8.168

6.  A Phase 3 Trial of 2 Years of Androgen Suppression and Radiation Therapy With or Without Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Final Results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Phase 3 Randomized Trial NRG Oncology RTOG 9902.

Authors:  Seth A Rosenthal; Daniel Hunt; A Oliver Sartor; Kenneth J Pienta; Leonard Gomella; David Grignon; Raghu Rajan; Kevin J Kerlin; Christopher U Jones; Michael Dobelbower; William U Shipley; Kenneth Zeitzer; Daniel A Hamstra; Viroon Donavanik; Marvin Rotman; Alan C Hartford; Jeffrey Michalski; Michael Seider; Harold Kim; Deborah A Kuban; Jennifer Moughan; Howard Sandler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  The evolving role of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the management of patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Elan Diamond; María del Carmen Garcias; Beerinder Karir; Scott T Tagawa
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 8.  Treatment strategies for high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Seth A Rosenthal; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  Tolerance of Phellodendron amurense bark extract (Nexrutine®) in patients with human prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; William E Jones; Chul S Ha; Carol A Jenkins; Addanki Pratap Kumar; Joseph Basler
Journal:  Phytother Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 5.878

Review 10.  The addition of chemotherapy in the definitive management of high risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Ferris; Yuan Liu; Jingning Ao; Jim Zhong; Mustafa Abugideiri; Theresa W Gillespie; Bradley C Carthon; Mehmet A Bilen; Omer Kucuk; Ashesh B Jani
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.