Literature DB >> 18990368

Comparison of microdose flare-up and antagonist multiple-dose protocols for poor-responder patients: a randomized study.

Aygul Demirol1, Timur Gurgan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the microdose flare-up and multiple-dose antagonist protocols for poor-responder patients in intracytoplasmic sperm injection-ET cycles.
DESIGN: A randomized, prospective study.
SETTING: Center for assisted reproductive technology in Turkey. PATIENT(S): Ninety patients with poor ovarian response in a minimum of two previous IVF cycles. INTERVENTION(S): All women were prospectively randomized into two groups by computer-assisted randomization. The patients in group 1 were stimulated according to the microdose flare-up protocol (n = 45), while the patients in group 2 were stimulated according to antagonist multiple-dose protocol (n = 45). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The mean number of mature oocytes retrieved was the primary outcome measure, and fertilization rate, implantation rate per embryo, and clinical pregnancy rates were secondary outcome measures. RESULT(S): The mean age of the women, the mean duration of infertility, basal FSH level, and the number of previous IVF cycles were similar in both groups. The total gonadotropin dose used was significantly higher in group 2, while the number of oocytes retrieved was significantly greater in group 1. Although the fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates were nonsignificantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2, the implantation rate was significantly higher in the microdose flare-up group than in the multiple-dose antagonist group (22% vs. 11%). CONCLUSION(S): The microdose flare-up protocol seems to have a better outcome in poor-responder patients, with a significantly higher mean number of mature oocytes retrieved and higher implantation rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18990368     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols efficacy in poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  Linli Hu; Zhiqin Bu; Yihong Guo; Yingchun Su; Jun Zhai; Yingpu Sun
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-04-15

2.  Diminished ovarian reserve in the United States assisted reproductive technology population: diagnostic trends among 181,536 cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System.

Authors:  Kate Devine; Sunni L Mumford; Mae Wu; Alan H DeCherney; Micah J Hill; Anthony Propst
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Optimal embryo transfer strategy in poor response may include freeze-all.

Authors:  Murat Berkkanoglu; Kevin Coetzee; Hasan Bulut; Kemal Ozgur
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Ovarian stimulation protocols for poor ovarian responders: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Man Di; Xiaohong Wang; Jing Wu; Hongya Yang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Comparison of the ultrashort gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-antagonist protocol with microdose flare -up protocol in poor responders: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Bülent Berker; Candan İltemir Duvan; Cemil Kaya; Ruşen Aytaç; Hakan Satıroğlu
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-12-01

6.  Effects of multicycle gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols on oxidative stress of follicular fluid and ovarian granulosa cells.

Authors:  Yucong Ma; Zhiming Zhao; Guimin Hao; Na Cui; Yanli Fan; Yucong Cao; Zhanwang Tan; Jingran Geng; Lijie Fan; Huilan Du; Bulang Gao
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.174

Review 7.  Aromatase inhibitors in stimulated IVF cycles.

Authors:  Evangelos G Papanikolaou; Nikolaos P Polyzos; Peter Humaidan; George Pados; Ernesto Bosch; Herman Tournaye; Basil Tarlatzis
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  A prospective randomised study comparing a GnRH-antagonist versus a GnRH-agonist short protocol for ovarian stimulation in patients referred for IVF.

Authors:  S Gordts; C Van Turnhout; R Campo; P Puttemans; M Valkenburg; S Gordts
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

9.  Variants Ala307Ala and Ser680Ser of 307 and 680 FSHr polymorphisms negatively influence on assisted reproductive techniques outcome and determine high probability of non-pregnancy in Caucasian patients.

Authors:  Belén Monge-Ochoa; Luis Montoro; Elisa Gil-Arribas; Julio Montoya; Eduardo Ruiz-Pesini; Manuel J López-Pérez; Francisco de Castro; Carmen Díez-Sánchez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.357

10.  Strategies for Pituitary Down-regulation to Optimize IVF/ICSI Outcome in Poor Ovarian Responders.

Authors:  Ahmed Badawy; Alaa Wageah; Mohamed El Gharib; Ezz Eldin Osman
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.