Literature DB >> 1899029

Quantitative analysis of the contribution of Glu46 and Asn98 to the guanosine specificity of ribonuclease T1.

J Steyaert1, C Opsomer, L Wyns, P Stanssens.   

Abstract

In the crystal structure of the ribonuclease T1 (RNase T1; EC 3.1.27.3)-2'-GMP complex the hydrogen-bonding potential of the guanine base is saturated [Arni, R., Heinemann, U., Tokuoka, R., & Saenger, W. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 15358-15368]. The oxygens of the Glu46 carboxylate and the Asn98 main-chain carbonyl act as hydrogen-bond acceptors for the N(1)H-C(2)-N(2)H2 part of the base. We measured the transesterification kinetics of wild-type and Glu46Ala RNase T1 using the GpU, IpU, and XpU series of analogous substrates. We found that the N(1)H---Glu46 O epsilon 1, the N(2)H---Glu46 O epsilon 2, and the N(2)H---Asn98 O hydrogen bonds have an apparent contribution of 2.7, 1.1, and 1.2 kcal/mol to the interaction energy of the enzyme and the transition state of the substrate. Wild-type RNase T1 discriminates guanine from nonionized xanthine (a guanine analogue in which the exocyclic amino group is replaced by an oxygen) by about 4.4 kcal/mol. Loss of the specific hydrogen bonds with the exocyclic amino group of the guanine base accounts for 2.4 kcal/mol of this discrimination energy; 2.0 kcal/mol is due to unfavorable non-H-bonded oxygen-oxygen contacts in the enzyme-xanthine complex. A pH dependence study shows that the deprotonated form of xanthine (i.e., the 6-keto-2-enolate anion; pKa = 5.4) is far less preferred, if not excluded, as substrate by wild-type RNase T1; this may be attributed to an electrostatic repulsion of the negatively charged xanthine by the Glu46 carboxylate group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1899029     DOI: 10.1021/bi00216a027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  7 in total

1.  The effect of net charge on the solubility, activity, and stability of ribonuclease Sa.

Authors:  K L Shaw; G R Grimsley; G I Yakovlev; A A Makarov; C N Pace
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Contribution of active site residues to the activity and thermal stability of ribonuclease Sa.

Authors:  Gennady I Yakovlev; Vladimir A Mitkevich; Kevin L Shaw; Saul Trevino; Stephanie Newsom; C Nick Pace; Alexander A Makarov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  The role of Glu-60 in the specificity of the recombinant ribonuclease from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (barnase) towards dinucleotides, poly(A) and RNA.

Authors:  K Bastyns; M Froeyer; G Volckaert; Y Engelborghs
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Are turns required for the folding of ribonuclease T1?

Authors:  J B Garrett; L S Mullins; F M Raushel
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  A ribonuclease specific for inosine-containing RNA: a potential role in antiviral defence?

Authors:  A D Scadden; C W Smith
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Structural and functional basis for RNA cleavage by Ire1.

Authors:  Alexei V Korennykh; Andrei A Korostelev; Pascal F Egea; Janet Finer-Moore; Robert M Stroud; Chao Zhang; Kevan M Shokat; Peter Walter
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 7.431

7.  Preferential selection of adenosines for modification by double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase.

Authors:  A G Polson; B L Bass
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.