Literature DB >> 18989909

Stereoelectronic and solvation effects determine hydroxymethyl conformational preferences in monosaccharides.

Christopher B Barnett1, Kevin J Naidoo.   

Abstract

Although the conformational preferences in glucose and galactose have been studied since the early 1970s, only recently have the glucose and galactose hydroxymethyl populations been resolved by combining (3)J(HH) and (2)J(HH) NMR coupling data using a modified Karplus equation. A preference for gauche conformations is observed in monosaccharides, but the reasons for this are not understood. We calculated the free energy of rotation profiles for glucose and galactose primary alcohols using a semiempirical description of the monosaccharides in QM/MM simulations. From this we observed excellent agreement between our simulated population distributions for glucose gg/gt/tg = 35:57:3 and galactose gg/gt/tg = 4:86:7 with those measured from NMR. A stereoelectronic analysis of the minimum energy conformations using natural bond orbitals provides a clear description of the stabilizing contribution to the gauche conformers stemming from the C-H bonding and the C-O antibonding orbital interactions, specifically sigma(C6-H) --> sigma*(C5-O5) and sigma(C5-H) --> sigma*(C6-O6). Analysis of the solution trajectories reveals that persistent intramolecular hydrogen bonds and intermolecular bridging hydrogen bonds formed by water molecules between the ring oxygen and the hydroxymethyl group further stabilizes the gt conformation making it the preferred rotamer in both hydrated glucose and galactose. The hydroxymethyl quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics molecular dynamics trajectories and derived rotational free energies for these monosaccharides in water solutions explain that the experimental observations are due to a combination of competing stereoelectronic (gauche), electronic (intramolecular hydrogen bonding), and electrostatic (solvent-saccharide hydrogen bonding) factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18989909     DOI: 10.1021/jp8067409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  7 in total

1.  Stereoelectronic Effects Impact Glycan Recognition.

Authors:  Caitlin M McMahon; Christine R Isabella; Ian W Windsor; Paul Kosma; Ronald T Raines; Laura L Kiessling
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Hydrogen bonds in galactopyranoside and glucopyranoside: a density functional theory study.

Authors:  Zahrabatoul Mosapour Kotena; Reza Behjatmanesh-Ardakani; Rauzah Hashim; Vijayan Manickam Achari
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Molecular simulations of dodecyl-β-maltoside micelles in water: influence of the headgroup conformation and force field parameters.

Authors:  Stéphane Abel; François-Yves Dupradeau; E Prabhu Raman; Alexander D MacKerell; Massimo Marchi
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Structural and thermodynamic insights into β-1,2-glucooligosaccharide capture by a solute-binding protein in Listeria innocua.

Authors:  Koichi Abe; Naoki Sunagawa; Tohru Terada; Yuta Takahashi; Takatoshi Arakawa; Kiyohiko Igarashi; Masahiro Samejima; Hiroyuki Nakai; Hayao Taguchi; Masahiro Nakajima; Shinya Fushinobu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Effects of varying the 6-position oxidation state of hexopyranoses: a systematic comparative computational analysis of 48 monosaccharide stereoisomers.

Authors:  Alison E Vickman; Daniel C Ashley; Mu-Hyun Baik; Nicola L B Pohl
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Anomeric and rotameric preferences of glucopyranose in vacuo, water and organic solvents.

Authors:  Sedat Karabulut; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Structural evidence for inter-residue hydrogen bonding observed for cellobiose in aqueous solution.

Authors:  William B O'Dell; David C Baker; Sylvia E McLain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.