Literature DB >> 18989664

Perceptual priming does not transfer interhemispherically in the acallosal brain.

J Forget1, Sarah Lippé, Maryse Lassonde.   

Abstract

Acallosal participants usually do not display any disconnection signs in tasks requiring an explicit or declarative type of response. They can accurately compare stimuli placed in each hand and they perform normally on lateralized recognition tasks. They, however, show impairment in tasks assessing interdependent motor control, bilateral coordination and they are also unable to intermanually transfer an implicit procedural motor skill. These deficits suggest that compensation might be limited when a motor component is involved. Alternately, it is also possible that interhemispheric transmission in callosal agenesis might be limited when implicit or unconscious processes are involved (Berlucchi et al. in Neuropsychologia 33:923-936, 1995; De Guise et al. in Brain 122:1049-1062, 1999). The aim of the present study was to assess interhemispheric transfer in two distinct nondeclarative tasks, namely visuoperceptual skill learning and perceptual priming, with a lateralized version of the fragmented picture task developed by Snodgrass et al. (Behav Res Methods Inst Comp 19:270-274, 1987) that did not involve any motor component. The performance of five acallosal and one early-callosotomized individuals was compared to that of control participants divided into four groups (n = 10) according to which hemisphere was trained (left or right) and which response mode was used (manual or verbal). Visuoperceptual skill learning was observed in all control groups except for the group submitted to training of the left hemisphere in the manual modality of response. The acallosal and early-callosotomized participants did not show any implicit learning of the visuoperceptual skill on any of the conditions. The evaluation of the perceptual priming effect in the second part of the testing revealed that the priming effect was restricted to the trained hemisphere in participants without corpus callosum, as opposed to all neurogically intact participants who presented interhemispheric transfer of the priming effect. These findings indicate that the compensatory pathways, most probably subcortical commissures, are insufficient to allow interhemispheric transfer of perceptual priming, confirming the limits of neural plasticity in the absence of the corpus callosum. They also support the dissociation between declarative and nondeclarative memory in the split-brain and acallosal participants suggested by Berlucchi et al. (1995) and observed by De Guise et al. (Brain 122:1049-1062, 1999). These results are further discussed within the context of neurobiological theories of memory systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18989664     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1602-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  58 in total

1.  Hemispheric encoding asymmetry is more apparent than real.

Authors:  Michael B Miller; Alan Kingstone; Michael S Gazzaniga
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The role of medial temporal lobe structures in implicit learning: an event-related FMRI study.

Authors:  Michael Rose; Hilde Haider; Cornelius Weiller; Christian Büchel
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  The rise and fall of priming: how visual exposure shapes cortical representations of objects.

Authors:  Laure Zago; Mark J Fenske; Elissa Aminoff; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; John T Wixted; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Lexical and semantic priming deficits in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  D P Salmon; A P Shimamura; N Butters; S Smith
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

7.  Absence of interhemispheric transfer of unilateral visuomotor learning in young children and individuals with agenesis of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  A J Chicoine; L Proteau; M Lassonde
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.253

8.  Is implicit learning spared in amnesia? Rule abstraction and item familiarity in artificial grammar learning.

Authors:  Shelley Channon; David Shanks; Theresa Johnstone; Kian Vakili; Jasmine Chin; Elizabeth Sinclair
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Conscious recollection and the human hippocampal formation: evidence from positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Schacter; N M Alpert; C R Savage; S L Rauch; M S Albert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Effects of early and late transection of the corpus callosum in children. A study of tactile and tactuomotor transfer and integration.

Authors:  M Lassonde; H Sauerwein; G Geoffroy; M Décarie
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  2 in total

1.  Delusional Disorder in a Patient with Corpus Callosum Agenesis.

Authors:  M S Bhatia; Rashmita Saha; Nimisha Doval
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 2.  Corpus callosum agenesis and rehabilitative treatment.

Authors:  Matteo Chiappedi; Maurizio Bejor
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 2.638

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.