Literature DB >> 18987543

Vascular pseudoinvasion in laparoscopic hysterectomy specimens for endometrial carcinoma: a grossing artifact?

Sumire Kitahara1, Christine Walsh, Michael Frumovitz, Anais Malpica, Elvio G Silva.   

Abstract

Over several years, it has been a matter of debate whether or not the use of a uterine balloon manipulator during laparoscopic hysterectomies for endometrial carcinoma (EC) may cause tumor disruption resulting in a positive peritoneal cytology. More recently, this procedure has been associated with vascular pseudoinvasion in cases of low-risk EC. In this study, we evaluated a series of 21 cases of low-risk EC treated by laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) to determine the incidence of this finding and to better characterize its histopathologic features. In addition, we reviewed 28 cases of low-risk EC treated by total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) for comparison. Clinical information was obtained from patients' charts. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides were retrospectively reviewed in all cases. The following information was recorded: tumor grade and tumor stage according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, tumor shape (polypoid versus flat), presence or absence of vascular space involvement (VSI), size and location of the vessels with tumor involvement, concomitant presence of artifactual clefts in the myometrium with tumor involvement if applicable, presence or absence of lymph node sampling and the presence or absence of involvement at this site, and results of peritoneal cytology. Seven of 21 (33%) cases of low-risk EC treated by LH in this study showed VSI. None of the cases treated by TAH had VSI (P=0.001). In all of the cases of LH with VSI, the endometrial tumor was polypoid. VSI was detected only in large, thick-walled vessels in the outer myometrium or in ectatic vessels anywhere in the myometrium; no tumor fragments were seen in small vessels. The tumor in the VSI consisted of conspicuous fragments of tumors detached from the vascular wall. The VSI also lacked the inflammatory perivascular infiltrate seen in many cases of bona fide lymphovascular invasion. In addition, all of the cases with VSI also showed fragments of tumor in artifactual clefts in the myometrium. None of the cases of LH in which lymph node sampling and/or peritoneal cytology were obtained showed tumor at this site. In summary, our study confirms that LH is indeed associated with a higher rate of vascular pseudoinvasion when compared with TAH. However, we cannot attribute this phenomenon to mechanical disruption, displacement, and transport of tumor tissue into vascular spaces by the use of a uterine manipulator alone. Instead, we propose that pathologists may be generating postoperative pseudoinvasion by mechanically transporting tumor into vascular spaces during the grossing process. Proper recognition of this artifact is of utmost importance to avoid the overtreatment of patients undergoing LH for low-risk EC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18987543     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31818a01bf

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  8 in total

Review 1.  Practical issues related to uterine pathology: staging, frozen section, artifacts, and Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  Lymphovascular space invasion in robotic surgery for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Mark R Hopkins; Abby M Richmond; Georgina Cheng; Susan Davidson; Monique A Spillman; Jeanelle Sheeder; Miriam D Post; Saketh R Guntupalli
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Pseudovascular Invasion: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Farinaz Seifi; Vinita Parkash; Mitchell Clark; Gulden Menderes; Christina Tierney; Dan-Arin Silasi; Masoud Azodi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Reproducibility of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) assessment in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Elke E M Peters; Carla Bartosch; W Glenn McCluggage; Catherine Genestie; Sigurd F Lax; Remi Nout; Jan Oosting; Naveena Singh; Huub C S H Smit; Vincent T H B M Smit; Koen K Van de Vijver; Tjalling Bosse
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  A Multicentric Randomized Trial to Evaluate the ROle of Uterine MANipulator on Laparoscopic/Robotic HYsterectomy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: The ROMANHY Trial.

Authors:  Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Emanuele Perrone; Camilla Fedele; Stefano Cianci; Tina Pasciuto; Vito Chiantera; Stefano Uccella; Alfredo Ercoli; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Anna Fagotti; Valerio Gallotta; Francesco Cosentino; Barbara Costantini; Stefano Restaino; Giorgia Monterossi; Andrea Rosati; Luigi Carlo Turco; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Francesco Fanfani; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies.

Authors:  Kiran H Clair; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.730

Review 7.  Unexpected result of minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kanao; Yoichi Aoki; Nobuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 8.  Role of uterine manipulator during laparoscopic endometrial cancer treatment.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Andrea Rosati; Stefano Uccella; Gaetano Riemma; Mattia Tarascio; Marco Torella; Pasquale De Franciscis; Nicola Colacurci; Stefano Cianci
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.