Literature DB >> 18986224

Spinal cord contusion based on precise vertebral stabilization and tissue displacement measured by combined assessment to discriminate small functional differences.

Yi Ping Zhang1, Darlene A Burke, Lisa B E Shields, Sergey Y Chekmenev, Toros Dincman, Yongjie Zhang, Yiyan Zheng, Rebecca R Smith, Richard L Benton, William H DeVries, Xiaoling Hu, David S K Magnuson, Scott R Whittemore, Christopher B Shields.   

Abstract

Contusive spinal cord injury (SCI) is the most common type of spinal injury seen clinically. Several rat contusion SCI models have been described, and all have strengths and weaknesses with respect to sensitivity, reproducibility, and clinical relevance. We developed the Louisville Injury System Apparatus (LISA), which contains a novel spine-stabilizing device that enables precise and stable spine fixation, and is based on tissue displacement to determine the severity of injury. Injuries graded from mild to moderately severe were produced using 0.2-, 0.4-, 0.6-, 0.8-, 1.0-, and 1.2-mm spinal cord displacement in rats. Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) and Louisville Swim Score (LSS) could not significantly distinguish between 0.2-mm lesion severities, except those of 0.6- and 0.8-mm BBB scores, but could between 0.4-mm injury differences or if the data were grouped (0.2-0.4, 0.6-0.8, and 1.0-1.2). Transcranial magnetic motor evoked potential (tcMMEP) response amplitudes were decreased 10-fold at 0.2-mm displacement, barely detected at 0.4-mm displacement, and absent with greater displacement injuries. In contrast, somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were recorded at 0.2- and 0.4-mm displacements with normal amplitudes and latencies but were detected at lower amplitudes at 0.6-mm displacement and absent with more severe injuries. Analyzing combined BBB, tcMMEP, and SSEP results enabled statistically significant discrimination between 0.2-, 0.4-, 0.6-, and 0.8-mm displacement injuries but not the more severe injuries. Present data document that the LISA produces reliable and reproducible SCI whose parameters of injury can be adjusted to more accurately reflect clinical SCI. Moreover, multiple outcome measures are necessary to accurately detect small differences in functional deficits and/or recovery. This is of crucial importance when trying to detect functional improvement after therapeutic intervention to treat SCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18986224      PMCID: PMC2756607          DOI: 10.1089/neu.2007.0388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  39 in total

1.  Experimental modeling of spinal cord injury: characterization of a force-defined injury device.

Authors:  Stephen W Scheff; Alexander G Rabchevsky; Isabella Fugaccia; John A Main; James E Lumpp
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Importance of specialised spinal units.

Authors:  J D Yeo
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  PKC mediates inhibitory effects of myelin and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans on axonal regeneration.

Authors:  Rajeev Sivasankaran; Jiong Pei; Kevin C Wang; Yi Ping Zhang; Christopher B Shields; Xiao-Ming Xu; Zhigang He
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-02-08       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Functional redundancy of ventral spinal locomotor pathways.

Authors:  David N Loy; David S K Magnuson; Y Ping Zhang; Stephen M Onifer; Michael D Mills; Qi-lin Cao; Jessica B Darnall; Lily C Fajardo; Darlene A Burke; Scott R Whittemore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Traumatic spinal cord injury produced by controlled contusion in mouse.

Authors:  L B Jakeman; Z Guan; P Wei; R Ponnappan; R Dzwonczyk; P G Popovich; B T Stokes
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Graded unilateral cervical spinal cord injury in the rat: evaluation of forelimb recovery and histological effects.

Authors:  J S Soblosky; J H Song; D H Dinh
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Graded contusion model of the mouse spinal cord using a pneumatic impact device.

Authors:  Toshitaka Seki; Kazutoshi Hida; Mitsuhiro Tada; Izumi Koyanagi; Yoshinobu Iwasaki
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Lasting paraplegia caused by loss of lumbar spinal cord interneurons in rats: no direct correlation with motor neuron loss.

Authors:  B Hadi; Y P Zhang; D A Burke; C B Shields; D S Magnuson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Characterization of an experimental spinal cord injury model using waveform and morphometric analysis.

Authors:  J C Falconer; P A Narayana; M Bhattacharjee; S J Liu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Anatomical correlates of locomotor recovery following dorsal and ventral lesions of the rat spinal cord.

Authors:  P Schucht; O Raineteau; M E Schwab; K Fouad
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.330

View more
  27 in total

1.  Deletion of the pro-apoptotic endoplasmic reticulum stress response effector CHOP does not result in improved locomotor function after severe contusive spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Sujata Saraswat Ohri; Melissa A Maddie; Yiping Zhang; Christopher B Shields; Michal Hetman; Scott R Whittemore
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  An In Vivo Duo-color Method for Imaging Vascular Dynamics Following Contusive Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Chen Chen; Yi Ping Zhang; Yan Sun; Wenhui Xiong; Lisa B E Shields; Christopher B Shields; Xiaoming Jin; Xiao-Ming Xu
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Randall-Selitto test: a new approach for the detection of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Eva Santos-Nogueira; Elena Redondo Castro; Renzo Mancuso; Xavier Navarro
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Gait analysis in normal and spinal contused mice using the TreadScan system.

Authors:  Jason E Beare; Johnny R Morehouse; William H DeVries; Gaby U Enzmann; Darlene A Burke; David S K Magnuson; Scott R Whittemore
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Hemisection spinal cord injury in rat: the value of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring.

Authors:  Beth A Cloud; Bret G Ball; Bingkun K Chen; Andrew M Knight; Jeffrey S Hakim; Ana M Ortiz; Anthony J Windebank
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Cortical PKC inhibition promotes axonal regeneration of the corticospinal tract and forelimb functional recovery after cervical dorsal spinal hemisection in adult rats.

Authors:  Xiaofei Wang; Jianguo Hu; Yun She; George M Smith; Xiao-Ming Xu
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Intrathecal Acetyl-L-Carnitine Protects Tissue and Improves Function after a Mild Contusive Spinal Cord Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Eric E Ewan; Theo Hagg
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.269

8.  Small-molecule protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibition as a neuroprotective treatment after spinal cord injury in adult rats.

Authors:  Shojiro Nakashima; Sheila A Arnold; Edward T Mahoney; Srinivas D Sithu; Y Ping Zhang; Stanley E D'Souza; Christopher B Shields; Theo Hagg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A Laser-Guided Spinal Cord Displacement Injury in Adult Mice.

Authors:  Xiangbing Wu; Wenrui Qu; Adewale A Bakare; Yi Ping Zhang; Collin M E Fry; Lisa B E Shields; Christopher B Shields; Xiao-Ming Xu
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 10.  Corticospinal reorganization after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Martin Oudega; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.