Literature DB >> 18985411

[Measurement of medical outcome quality using administative data in Germany].

G Heller1.   

Abstract

While internationally low-effort reporting and quality assurance systems based on routine data for hospitals were implemented a long time ago, the evaluation of the treatment quality in hospitals according to section sign 137 SGB V in Germany still relies on special data collection, which demands considerable extra time and effort for the healthcare providers. The current article starts by addressing the question whether quality analyses using primary data sources should be preferred to analyses using secondary data analyses. Subsequently, current possibilities of measuring outcome quality, using administrative routine data, will be illustrated, referring to the large collaborative project Quality Assurance of Hospital Care with Routine Data (QSR). This project was carried out in order to examine possibilities of measuring quality based on routine administrative data in Germany from 2002-2007. The objectives of this article are to present a summary of the project's current status as well as to provide perspectives of future quality assurance with routine data in Germany. In addition, some general problems in measurement of outcome quality, the volume-prevalence problem and the problem of risk adjustment are presented, and possible solutions are proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18985411     DOI: 10.1007/s00103-008-0652-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz        ISSN: 1436-9990            Impact factor:   1.513


  4 in total

1.  [Clinical quality measurement in anaesthesia from routine data. Examples of appendectomy and resection of the colon].

Authors:  B Jüttner; K Stenger; G Heller; A Krause; C Günster; D Scheinichen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Joint replacement quality index: the perspective of resident physicians].

Authors:  K Opetz; J Steinhäuser; S Joos; J Szecsenyi; G Heller; E Forstmaier; Katharina Glassen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [Potentials and limitations of the planned compulsory quality assurance program for cataract surgery (Qesü)].

Authors:  U Hahn; B Bertram; F Krummenauer; A Reuscher; E Fabian; T Neuhann; S Schmickler; I Neuhann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  A methodological approach to identify external factors for indicator-based risk adjustment illustrated by a cataract surgery register.

Authors:  Ursula Hahn; Irmingard Neuhann; Stefanie Schmickler; Frank Krummenauer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.