Literature DB >> 18985108

The liver and the moral organ.

Marc D Hauser1.   

Abstract

Drawing on an analogy to language, I argue that a suite of novel questions emerge when we consider our moral faculty in a similar light. In particular, I suggest the possibility that our moral judgments are derived from unconscious, intuitive processes that operate over the causal-intentional structure of actions and their consequences. On this model, we are endowed with a moral faculty that generates judgments about permissible and forbidden actions prior to the involvement of our emotions and systems of conscious, rational deliberation. This framing of the problem sets up specific predictions about the role of particular neural structures and psychological processes in the generation of moral judgments as well as in the generation of moral behavior. I sketch the details of these predictions and point to relevant data that speak to the validity of thinking of our moral intuitions as grounded in a moral organ.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 18985108      PMCID: PMC2555424          DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsl026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci        ISSN: 1749-5016            Impact factor:   3.436


  14 in total

1.  How (and where) does moral judgment work?

Authors:  Joshua Greene; Jonathan Haidt
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Understanding other minds: linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  R Saxe; S Carey; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Norms with feeling: towards a psychological account of moral judgment.

Authors:  Shaun Nichols
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-06

4.  Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief.

Authors:  Dana Samson; Ian A Apperly; Claudia Chiavarino; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-11       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment.

Authors:  Joshua D Greene; Leigh E Nystrom; Andrew D Engell; John M Darley; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: testing three principles of harm.

Authors:  Fiery Cushman; Liane Young; Marc Hauser
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-12

7.  Loss of disgust. Perception of faces and emotions in Huntington's disease.

Authors:  R Sprengelmeyer; A W Young; A J Calder; A Karnat; H Lange; V Hömberg; D I Perrett; D Rowland
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements.

Authors:  Michael Koenigs; Liane Young; Ralph Adolphs; Daniel Tranel; Fiery Cushman; Marc Hauser; Antonio Damasio
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Disgust implicated in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  R Sprengelmeyer; A W Young; I Pundt; A Sprengelmeyer; A J Calder; G Berrios; R Winkel; W Vollmöeller; W Kuhn; G Sartory; H Przuntek
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1997-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  A Bechara; A R Damasio; H Damasio; S W Anderson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun
View more
  11 in total

1.  Moral kinematics: the role of physical factors in moral judgments.

Authors:  Rumen I Iliev; Sonya Sachdeva; Douglas L Medin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

Review 2.  The neurobiology of moral behavior: review and neuropsychiatric implications.

Authors:  Mario F Mendez
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.790

3.  From moral to legal judgment: the influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics.

Authors:  Stephan Schleim; Tade M Spranger; Susanne Erk; Henrik Walter
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  A functional imaging investigation of moral deliberation and moral intuition.

Authors:  Carla L Harenski; Olga Antonenko; Matthew S Shane; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Individual differences in moral judgment competence influence neural correlates of socio-normative judgments.

Authors:  Kristin Prehn; Isabell Wartenburger; Katja Mériau; Christina Scheibe; Oliver R Goodenough; Arno Villringer; Elke van der Meer; Hauke R Heekeren
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Parsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: ALE meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy.

Authors:  Danilo Bzdok; Leonhard Schilbach; Kai Vogeley; Karla Schneider; Angela R Laird; Robert Langner; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  The neurobiology of moral sense: facts or hypotheses?

Authors:  Donatella Marazziti; Stefano Baroni; Paola Landi; Diana Ceresoli; Liliana Dell'osso
Journal:  Ann Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Moral dilemmas in females: children are more utilitarian than adults.

Authors:  Monica Bucciarelli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08

9.  Abnormal frontostriatal activity in recently abstinent cocaine users during implicit moral processing.

Authors:  Brendan M Caldwell; Carla L Harenski; Keith A Harenski; Samantha J Fede; Vaughn R Steele; Michael R Koenigs; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Deconstructing the brain's moral network: dissociable functionality between the temporoparietal junction and ventro-medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Oriel Feldmanhall; Dean Mobbs; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.436

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.