Literature DB >> 18985076

Does one size fit all? The suitability of standard ozone exposure metric conversion ratios and implications for epidemiology.

G Brooke Anderson1, Michelle L Bell.   

Abstract

Several exposure metrics have been applied in health research and policy settings to represent ozone exposure, such as the 24 h average and daily 8 h maximum. Frequently, results calculated using one exposure metric are converted using a simple ratio to compare or combine findings with results using a different metric. This conversion, however, assumes that such a ratio is constant across locations and time periods. We investigated the appropriateness of this conversion method by examining the relationships among various forms of ozone concentrations (24 h average, daily 1 h maximum, and daily 8 h maximum) within and between communities for 78 US communities from 2000 to 2004 and compared results to commonly used conversion ratios. We explored whether the relationships between ozone exposure metrics differ by region, weather, season, and city-specific characteristics. Analysis revealed variation in the relationship among ozone metrics, both across communities and across time within individual communities, indicating that conversion of ozone exposure metrics with a standard ratio introduces uncertainty. For example, the average ratio of the daily 8 h maximum to the daily concentration ranged from 1.23 to 1.83. Within a community, days with higher ozone levels had lower ratios. Relationships among metrics within a community were associated with daily temperature. The community-average exposure metric ratios were lower for communities with higher long-term ozone levels. Ozone metric ratios differed by season because of the different rate of change of ozone metrics throughout the year. We recommend that health effects studies present results from multiple ozone exposure metrics, if possible. When conversions are necessary, more accurate estimates can be obtained using summaries of data for a given location and time period if available, or by basing conversion ratios on data from a similar city and season, such as the results provided in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18985076      PMCID: PMC3169292          DOI: 10.1038/jes.2008.69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  12 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiological studies of acute ozone exposures and mortality.

Authors:  G D Thurston; K Ito
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

2.  Metrics matter: conflicting air quality rankings from different indices of air pollution.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Benjamin F Hobbs; Hugh Ellis
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Francesca Dominici; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Associations between ozone and daily mortality: analysis and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Ito; Samantha F De Leon; Morton Lippmann
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  The health benefits of reduced tropospheric ozone in California.

Authors:  Bart D Ostro; Hien Tran; Jonathan I Levy
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  Analysis of air pollution in two major Korean cities: trends, seasonal variations, daily 1-hour maximum versus other hour-based concentrations, and standard exceedances.

Authors:  W K Jo; I H Yoon; C W Nam
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 8.071

7.  Relationships of ozone exposure to pine injury in the Sierra Nevada and San Bernardino Mountains of California, USA.

Authors:  M J Arbaugh; P R Miller; J J Carroll; B Takemoto; T Procter
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 8.071

8.  Assessing the risk of foliar injury from ozone on vegetation in parks in the U.S. National Park Service's Vital Signs Network.

Authors:  Robert Kohut
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 9.  Assessing the public health benefits of reduced ozone concentrations.

Authors:  J I Levy; T J Carrothers; J T Tuomisto; J K Hammitt; J S Evans
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  The exposure-response curve for ozone and risk of mortality and the adequacy of current ozone regulations.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Roger D Peng; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  10 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of the Association between Short-Term Exposure to Ambient Ozone and Respiratory Hospital Admissions.

Authors:  Meng Ji; Daniel S Cohan; Michelle L Bell
Journal:  Environ Res Lett       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.793

2.  American Thoracic Society and Marron Institute Report. Estimated Excess Morbidity and Mortality Caused by Air Pollution above American Thoracic Society-Recommended Standards, 2011-2013.

Authors:  Kevin R Cromar; Laura A Gladson; Lars D Perlmutt; Marya Ghazipura; Gary W Ewart
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-08

3.  Short-term effects of multiple ozone metrics on daily mortality in a megacity of China.

Authors:  Tiantian Li; Meilin Yan; Wenjun Ma; Jie Ban; Tao Liu; Hualiang Lin; Zhaorong Liu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  PM2.5 and ozone health impacts and disparities in New York City: sensitivity to spatial and temporal resolution.

Authors:  Iyad Kheirbek; Katherine Wheeler; Sarah Walters; Daniel Kass; Thomas Matte
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 5.  Who is more affected by ozone pollution? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michelle L Bell; Antonella Zanobetti; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  [Monitoring metrics for short-term exposure to ambient ozone and pulmonary function and airway inflammation in healthy young adults].

Authors:  J H Chen; D T Hu; X Jia; W Niu; F R Deng; X B Guo
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-06-18

7.  Improving the linkages between air pollution epidemiology and quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Michelle L Bell; Katy Walker; Bryan Hubbell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Climate change and environmental impacts on maternal and newborn health with focus on Arctic populations.

Authors:  Charlotta Rylander; Jon Ø Odland; Torkjel M Sandanger
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Rethinking Meta-Analysis: Applications for Air Pollution Data and Beyond.

Authors:  Julie E Goodman; Catherine Petito Boyce; Sonja N Sax; Leslie A Beyer; Robyn L Prueitt
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.000

10.  Comparing ozone metrics on associations with outpatient visits for respiratory diseases in Taipei Metropolitan area.

Authors:  Yu-Kai Lin; Shuenn-Chin Chang; Chitsan Lin; Yi-Chun Chen; Yu-Chun Wang
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 8.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.