Literature DB >> 18984977

Current status of prognostic immunohistochemical markers for urothelial bladder cancer.

R Rosenblatt1, S Jonmarker, R Lewensohn, L Egevad, A Sherif, K M Kälkner, S Nilsson, A Valdman, A Ullén.   

Abstract

The management and prognostication of patients with urothelial carcinomas (UCs), the most common histological type of bladder cancer, is mainly based on clinicopathological parameters. Several markers have been proposed to monitor this disease, including individual cell cycle-related proteins such as p53, pRb, p16, p21 and p27. Other putative markers are the oncogene products of FGFR3 and the ErbB family, proliferation markers including Ki-67, Aurora-A and survivin and different components within the immune system. In this review, a total of 12 parameters were evaluated and their discriminatory power compared. It is concluded that, in single-marker analyses, the proliferation markers Ki-67, survivin and Aurora-A offer the best potential to predict disease progression since they were all able to demonstrate independent prognostic power in repeated studies. Markers related to the immune system (e.g. CD8+ cells, regulatory T cells and cyclooxygenase-2 expression) or oncogene products of the ErbB family and FGFR3 are less powerful predictors of outcome or have not been equally well studied. The cell cycle-related proteins p53, pRb, p16, p21 and p27 have been extensively studied, but their usefulness as single prognostic markers remains unclear. However, in multimarker analyses, these markers appear to add prognostic information, indicating that they may contribute to more accurate treatment of UC. Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18984977     DOI: 10.1159/000170878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  11 in total

Review 1.  Differentiating rectal carcinoma by an immunohistological analysis of carcinomas of pelvic organs based on the NCBI Literature Survey and the Human Protein Atlas database.

Authors:  Koh Miura; Kazuyuki Ishida; Wataru Fujibuchi; Akihiro Ito; Hitoshi Niikura; Hitoshi Ogawa; Iwao Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Expression profiling for bladder cancer: strategies to uncover prognostic factors.

Authors:  Georg Bartsch; Anirban P Mitra; Richard J Cote
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.512

3.  Expression status and prognostic significance of mammalian target of rapamycin pathway members in urothelial carcinoma of urinary bladder after cystectomy.

Authors:  Luciana Schultz; Roula Albadine; Jessica Hicks; Sana Jadallah; Angelo M DeMarzo; Ying-Bei Chen; Matthew E Nielsen; Matthew E Neilsen; Mark L Gonzalgo; David Sidransky; Mark Schoenberg; George J Netto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of p21 (Cip1/Waf1) expression in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Kun Tang; Chenghe Wang; Zhong Chen; Hua Xu; Zhangqun Ye
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01

5.  Inhibition of bladder cancer by broccoli isothiocyanates sulforaphane and erucin: characterization, metabolism, and interconversion.

Authors:  Besma Abbaoui; Kenneth M Riedl; Robin A Ralston; Jennifer M Thomas-Ahner; Steven J Schwartz; Steven K Clinton; Amir Mortazavi
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 5.914

6.  Bladder cancer-associated protein, a potential prognostic biomarker in human bladder cancer.

Authors:  José M A Moreira; Gita Ohlsson; Pavel Gromov; Ronald Simon; Guido Sauter; Julio E Celis; Irina Gromova
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 5.911

7.  A step towards refining prognostication in individual patients with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Muhammed Mubarak
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2013-04

8.  Comparison between whole mount tissue preparations and virtual tissue microarray samples for measuring Ki-67 and apoptosis indices in human bladder cancer: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Hisashi Oshiro; Bogdan A Czerniak; Kentaro Sakamaki; Koji Tsuta; Jolanta Bondaruk; Afsaneh Keyhani; Colin P Dinney; Takeshi Nagai; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  MicroRNA-3619-5p suppresses bladder carcinoma progression by directly targeting β-catenin and CDK2 and activating p21.

Authors:  Qingsong Zhang; Shuo Miao; Xihong Han; Chuanchang Li; Mengyang Zhang; Kai Cui; Tao Xiong; Zhong Chen; Chenghe Wang; Hua Xu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 8.469

10.  Immunohistochemical evaluation of cell cycle regulators: impact on predicting prognosis in stage t1 urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  Hans Olsson; Per Hultman; Nastaran Monsef; Johan Rosell; Staffan Jahnson
Journal:  ISRN Urol       Date:  2012-12-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.