Literature DB >> 18984644

Evaluation of vancomycin and daptomycin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations.

Steven N Leonard1, Michael J Rybak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Glycopeptides have historically been the drugs of choice for the treatment of infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, the continued selective pressure has led to the emergence of non-susceptible strains including heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA). Infections with hVISA have been associated with poor outcomes including vancomycin treatment failures. The objective of this study was to evaluate vancomycin and daptomycin against vancomycin-susceptible MRSA and hVISA in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model with simulated endocardial vegetations.
METHODS: Six clinical isolates obtained from patients at the Detroit Medical Center were used: MRSA 494, MRSA 67, hVISA R1720, hVISS R2295, hVISA R3640 and hVISA R1629. All heteroresistant strains were confirmed by a population analysis profile ratio, with Mu3 as a control strain. Vancomycin regimens of 1 g every 12 h and 2 g every 12 h and daptomycin regimens of 6, 10 and 12 mg/kg daily were utilized in a PK/PD model over 72 h.
RESULTS: Against MRSA isolates, vancomycin displayed minimal activity and minimal-to-no activity against hVISA. In general, the use of high dose vancomycin over standard dose vancomycin did not improve activity except against one of six isolates (MRSA 494). Daptomycin was bactericidal against both MRSA and hVISA isolates, although the rate of kill was slower against hVISA.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, daptomycin achieved rapid and effective kill against both MRSA and hVISA while vancomycin displayed slow and minimal kill against MRSA and minimal-to-no activity against hVISA, regardless of high dose exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18984644     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkn439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  6 in total

1.  Impact of dose de-escalation and escalation on daptomycin's pharmacodynamics against clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro model.

Authors:  Celine Vidaillac; Molly E Steed; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Ceftaroline increases membrane binding and enhances the activity of daptomycin against daptomycin-nonsusceptible vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Brian J Werth; George Sakoulas; Warren E Rose; Joseph Pogliano; Ryan Tewhey; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Observed Antagonistic Effect of Linezolid on Daptomycin or Vancomycin Activity against Biofilm-Forming Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model.

Authors:  Megan K Luther; Kerry L LaPlante
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, including vancomycin-intermediate and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains: resistance mechanisms, laboratory detection, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Benjamin P Howden; John K Davies; Paul D R Johnson; Timothy P Stinear; M Lindsay Grayson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Daptomycin susceptibility of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Rajneet Kaur; Vikas Gautam; Pallab Ray; Gagandeep Singh; Lipika Singhal; Rupinder Tiwari
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Synergy between vancomycin and nafcillin against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Steven N Leonard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.