Literature DB >> 18984505

Breaking the barriers: the promise of computer-assisted screening for intimate partner violence.

Paula Rinard Renker1.   

Abstract

Although intimate partner violence (IPV) affects hundreds of thousands of women, the majority of women seen in health care settings are not screened for IPV. Many women are hesitant to disclose their abusive situations to their health care providers and, sadly, there is evidence that when women do disclose violence, their health care providers do not give them needed support and information. This article discusses the importance of IPV screening and barriers that may contribute to the current lack of screening by providers and the low disclosure rate by IPV survivors, describes how computer-assisted screening for IPV can address those barriers, and reports the findings of an integrative review of studies about computer-assisted self-interview (CASI) IPV screening. Computer screening strategies consistently identified a higher prevalence of IPV and were the approach preferred by the study participants. The findings of these initial studies provide support for the development and testing of computer screening and intervention strategies for IPV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18984505     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  16 in total

1.  In person versus computer screening for intimate partner violence among pregnant patients.

Authors:  Judy C Chang; Diane Dado; Sara Schussler; Lynn Hawker; Cynthia L Holland; Jessica G Burke; Patricia A Cluss
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-07-06

2.  Trauma-Informed Personalized Scripts to Address Partner Violence and Reproductive Coercion: Preliminary Findings from an Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Amber L Hill; Hadas Zachor; Kelley A Jones; Janine Talis; Sarah Zelazny; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Self-reporting DSM-5/ICD-11 clinically significant intimate partner violence and child abuse: Convergent and response process validity.

Authors:  Richard E Heyman; Jeffery D Snarr; Amy M Smith Slep; Katherine J W Baucom; David J Linkh
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2019-07-22

4.  Improving injury prevention through health information technology.

Authors:  Tamara M Haegerich; David E Sugerman; Joseph L Annest; Joanne Klevens; Grant T Baldwin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Computerized intervention for reducing intimate partner victimization for perinatal women seeking mental health treatment: A multisite randomized clinical trial protocol.

Authors:  Dawn M Johnson; Golfo Tzilos Wernette; Ted R Miller; Maria Muzik; Christina A Raker; Caron Zlotnick
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Comparing the feasibility, acceptability, clinical-, and cost-effectiveness of mental health e-screening to paper-based screening on the detection of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial risk in pregnant women: a study protocol of a randomized, parallel-group, superiority trial.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Sheila McDonald; Anne Biringer; Marie-Paule Austin; Kathy Hegadoren; Sarah McDonald; Rebecca Giallo; Arto Ohinmaa; Gerri Lasiuk; Glenda MacQueen; Wendy Sword; Marie Lane-Smith; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  An integrated web-based mental health intervention of assessment-referral-care to reduce stress, anxiety, and depression in hospitalized pregnant women with medically high-risk pregnancies: a feasibility study protocol of hospital-based implementation.

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Selikke Janes-Kelley; Janie Tyrrell; Lorna Clark; Deena Hamza; Penny Holmes; Cheryl Parkes; Nomagugu Moyo; Sheila McDonald; Marie-Paule Austin
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-01-16

Review 8.  A Scoping Review of Intimate Partner Violence Screening Programs for Health Care Professionals.

Authors:  Sheila Sprague; Gerard P Slobogean; Hayley Spurr; Paula McKay; Taryn Scott; Erika Arseneau; Muzammil Memon; Mohit Bhandari; Aparna Swaminathan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What is needed to implement a computer-assisted health risk assessment tool? An exploratory concept mapping study.

Authors:  Farah Ahmad; Cameron Norman; Patricia O'Campo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, superiority trial comparing the clinical and cost- effectiveness of integrated online mental health assessment-referral-care in pregnancy to usual prenatal care on prenatal and postnatal mental health and infant health and development: the Integrated Maternal Psychosocial Assessment to Care Trial (IMPACT).

Authors:  Dawn Kingston; Marie-Paule Austin; Kathy Hegadoren; Sheila McDonald; Gerri Lasiuk; Sarah McDonald; Maureen Heaman; Anne Biringer; Wendy Sword; Rebecca Giallo; Tejal Patel; Marie Lane-Smith; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.