Literature DB >> 18984330

Evaluation of static progressive stretch for the treatment of wrist stiffness.

Mike S McGrath1, Slif D Ulrich, Peter M Bonutti, Jonathan M Smith, Thorsten M Seyler, Michael A Mont.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Decreased wrist flexion and/or extension after trauma or surgery can be a challenging problem. Physical therapy, orthoses, and additional surgical interventions may not restore the desired range of motion or functionality. The purpose of this study was to assess the total arc of motion and the satisfaction scores of patients who had wrist stiffness and who were treated with a bidirectional, patient-directed orthosis that used the principles of static progressive stretch.
METHODS: Forty-seven patients who experienced posttraumatic or postsurgical wrist stiffness were treated with a patient-directed orthosis. Treatment consisted of a 30- to 60-minute stretching protocol performed 1 to 3 times per day. Compliance with the device, treatment duration, mean total arc of motion, patient satisfaction, and complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: The total arc of motion increased by a mean of 35 degrees (range, 5 degrees to 100 degrees ) after a mean of 10 weeks of treatment (range, 5 to 26 weeks). The mean flexion and extension increased by 18 degrees (range, 1 degrees to 50 degrees ) and 17 degrees (range, 3 degrees to 50 degrees ), respectively. Assessment of age, gender, and time before commencement of treatment showed that these factors did not significantly affect the magnitude of improvement or the final arc of motion. The mean patient satisfaction score was 8.2 points on a scale of 0 to 10 points. All patients completed the treatment, and there were no complications reported with use of the device.
CONCLUSIONS: All of the patients who used this protocol improved their total arc of motion. A splinting device that uses the principles of static progressive stretch is a useful treatment for patients who have posttraumatic or postsurgical wrist stiffness and whose progress has plateaued after a course of conventional physical therapy. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18984330     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  7 in total

1.  Static progressive stretch improves range of motion in arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; German A Marulanda; Mike S McGrath; Michael A Mont; Michael G Zywiel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Static progressive stretch orthosis-consensus modality to treat knee stiffness-rationale and literature review.

Authors:  Anil Bhave; Nipun Sodhi; Hiba K Anis; Joseph O Ehiorobo; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

3.  Static progressive orthoses for the upper extremity: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Deborah A Schwartz
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-12-16

4.  Manipulation under anaesthesia versus low stretch device in poor range of motion after TKA.

Authors:  E Witvrouw; J Bellemans; J Victor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Use of a static progressive stretch orthosis to treat post-traumatic ankle stiffness.

Authors:  Christopher R Costa; Mark J McElroy; Aaron J Johnson; Bradley M Lamm; Michael A Mont
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-07-04

6.  Performance adaptive training control strategy for recovering wrist movements in stroke patients: a preliminary, feasibility study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Masia; Maura Casadio; Psiche Giannoni; Giulio Sandini; Pietro Morasso
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2009-12-07       Impact factor: 4.262

7.  Methods for assessment of patient adherence to removable orthoses used after surgery or trauma to the appendicular skeleton: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gareth Davies; Daniel Yeomans; Zoe Tolkien; Irene A Kreis; Shelley Potter; Matthew D Gardiner; Abhilash Jain; James Henderson; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.