Literature DB >> 18983207

Physicians' opinions about responsibility for patient out-of-pocket costs and formulary prescribing in two Midwestern states.

Shamima Khan1, Robert Sylvester, David Scott, Bruce Pitts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multi-tier copayment designs in pharmacy benefit plans are intended to steer patients and prescribers to preferred drug therapies that have lower out-of-pocket costs for patients.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess physicians' prescribing experiences and opinions in a multi-tier, primarily 3-tier formulary environment in 2 Midwestern states.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of physicians practicing in either Minnesota or North Dakota. A packet consisting of a survey instrument, a cover letter, and a postage-paid return envelope was mailed to a random sample of 690 physician members of the Minnesota Medical Association (n = 460, 5.1% of members) or the North Dakota Medical Association (n = 230, 25.6% of members). Surveys were mailed between March and May 2006. Nonresponders were mailed up to 2 additional surveys. Survey items included practice specialty, sources used to obtain drug information, perceived importance of cost containment actions (e.g., prescribing drug with lowest total cost, prescribing drug that minimizes patient out-of-pocket cost), and how often the physician was personally aware of the following when writing a prescription: identity of the patient's insurer, patient's pharmacy benefit structure, preferred medications on the insurer's formulary, patient's copayment (out-of-pocket cost) responsibility, and list price of the medication.
RESULTS: The survey response rate was 49.8% (296 of 594). The results were as follows: 93.5% of respondents agreed that it was important to prescribe the drug that would minimize the patient's out-of-pocket costs, 73.2% agreed that it was important to discuss out-of-pocket medication costs with patients, 81.8% of respondents agreed that it was important to prescribe the drug with the lowest total costs, and 33.3% of respondents believed that it was their responsibility to prescribe a preferred (formulary) medication. According to the survey, 61.6% of respondents were rarely or never aware of their patient's copayment amounts, and 42.4% were rarely or never aware of the list price of the medication. Physician specialty was associated with the awareness of the identity of the patient's insurer (generalists, 41.1% vs. specialists, 19.2%; P = 0.001) and use of personal digital assistant (PDA) when prescribing (generalists, 38.9% vs. specialists, 21.1%; P = 0.005).
CONCLUSION: Physicians who responded to this survey believed that it was important to prescribe drugs that would minimize patients' prescription copayments, but they were often unaware of the preferred medications on the formulary, the patients' copayment amounts, or the price of the drugs prescribed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18983207     DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.8.780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm        ISSN: 1083-4087


  11 in total

1.  Racial differences in the usage of information technology: evidence from a national physician survey.

Authors:  Doohee Lee; Phil Rutsohn
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

2.  Factors associated with probability of personal digital assistant-based dietary self-monitoring in those with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Mary Ann Sevick; Roslyn A Stone; Susan Zickmund; Yuanyuan Wang; Mary Korytkowski; Lora E Burke
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-03-16

3.  Clinicians' Values and Preferences for Medication Adherence and Cost Clinical Decision Support in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Shubha Bhat; Catherine Grace Derington; Katy E Trinkley
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Coping strategies used by patients infected with hepatitis C virus who are facing medication costs.

Authors:  Chiranjeev Sanyal; Ethel Langille Ingram; Ingrid S Sketris; Kevork M Peltekian; Susan Kirkland
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2011-03

5.  Yelp for Prescribers: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Providing Antibiotic Cost Data and Prescription of High-Cost Antibiotics in an Academic and Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  Kira L Newman; Jay Varkey; Justin Rykowski; Arun V Mohan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Patient-provider communication regarding drug costs in Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes: a TRIAD Study.

Authors:  Julie A Schmittdiel; Neil Steers; O Kenrik Duru; Susan L Ettner; Arleen F Brown; Vicki Fung; John Hsu; Elaine Quiter; Chien-Wen Tseng; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Are prescribing doctors sensitive to the price that their patients have to pay in the Spanish National Health System?

Authors:  Beatriz González López-Valcárcel; Julián Librero; Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno; Salvador Peiró
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  The effects of introducing an electronic prescription system with no copayments.

Authors:  Ida Iren Eriksen; Hans Olav Melberg
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2015-07-16

9.  Development and validation of an instrument designed to measure factors influencing physician prescribing decisions.

Authors:  Mohsen Ali Murshid; Zurina Mohaidin; Mohammad Zayed
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2019-12-14

10.  Regional Variation in Pharmacist Perception of the Financial Impact of Medicare Part D.

Authors:  Shamima Khan; Joshua J Spooner; Harlan E Spotts
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.