Literature DB >> 18981927

Sex differences in completion of a 12-month cardiac rehabilitation programme: an analysis of 5922 women and men.

Susan Marzolini1, Dina Brooks, Paul I Oh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reasons for greater premature withdrawal from cardiac rehabilitation programmes (CRP) in women compared with men and differences in baseline predictors of withdrawal have not been extensively studied.
METHODS: Reasons for withdrawal from a 12-month CRP in 1089 women and 4833 men were ascertained by interview. Regression analysis was used to determine demographic and baseline medical conditions that predicted noncompletion.
RESULTS: Noncompletion was higher in women than men (35 vs. 29%, P<0.001), however, multivariate regression revealed that sex was not the main driver of withdrawal but rather, other factors common to women at entry to CR could predict noncompletion (i.e. not being married, being obese, lower peak oxygen uptake, not having earlier coronary artery bypass graft surgery, being on antidepressant medication and not on lipid lowering or beta-blockade medication). By interview, a greater proportion of women than men withdrew for medical issues (P<0.001), specifically musculoskeletal conditions (P=0.002) and multiple medical problems (P=0.02). A greater proportion of women withdrew for transportation (P<0.001) and family issues (P=0.009), whereas work issues affected men more than women (P=0.009), as did lack of interest (P=0.009). Women were more likely to withdraw than men regardless of age (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Women were significantly more likely to withdraw from CRP than men because of greater medical problems, specifically musculoskeletal and multiple medical reasons. Lack of interest and work obligations were greater barriers for men while transportation and family obligations more often affected women. Difference in withdrawal can be explained by the profile of women rather than by sex independently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18981927     DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e32830c1ce3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil        ISSN: 1741-8267


  20 in total

Review 1.  Smoking and cardiac rehabilitation participation: Associations with referral, attendance and adherence.

Authors:  Diann E Gaalema; Alexander Y Cutler; Stephen T Higgins; Philip A Ades
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Predicting cardiac rehabilitation attendance in a gender-tailored randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Theresa M Beckie; Jason W Beckstead
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.081

Review 3.  Cardiac Rehabilitation for Women: A Systematic Review of Barriers and Solutions.

Authors:  Marta Supervía; Jose R Medina-Inojosa; Colin Yeung; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Ray W Squires; Carmen M Pérez-Terzic; LaPrincess C Brewer; Shawn E Leth; Randal J Thomas
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Do women with pelvic floor dysfunction referred by gynaecologists and urologists at hospitals complete a pelvic floor muscle training programme? A retrospective study, 1992-2008.

Authors:  Sigrid Tibaek; Christian Dehlendorff
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua R Smith; Randal J Thomas; Amanda R Bonikowske; Shane M Hammer; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 23.213

Review 6.  Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults: Apropos yet significantly underutilized.

Authors:  Andrew H Lutz; Daniel E Forman
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 11.278

7.  Feasibility and effects of adapted cardiac rehabilitation after stroke: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Ada Tang; Susan Marzolini; Paul Oh; William E McIlroy; Dina Brooks
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 8.  A systematic review of patient reported factors associated with uptake and completion of cardiovascular lifestyle behaviour change.

Authors:  Jenni Murray; Cheryl Leanne Craigs; Kate Mary Hill; Stephanie Honey; Allan House
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 9.  Underutilization of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Women: BARRIERS AND SOLUTIONS.

Authors:  Sherrie Khadanga; Diann E Gaalema; Patrick Savage; Philip A Ades
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.646

10.  Cardiac rehabilitation patient and organizational factors: what keeps patients in programs?

Authors:  Karam I Turk-Adawi; Neil B Oldridge; Sergey S Tarima; William B Stason; Donald S Shepard
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.