Literature DB >> 18981733

Cancer cell killing via ROS: to increase or decrease, that is the question.

Jie Wang1, Jing Yi.   

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) act as a second messenger in cell signaling and are essential for various biological processes in normal cells. Any aberrance in redox balance may relate to human pathogenesis including cancers. Since ROS are usually increased in cancer cells due to oncogene activation, relative lack of blood supply or other variances and ROS do involve in initiation, progression and metastasis of cancers, ROS are considered oncogenic. Ironically, ROS production is a mechanism shared by all non-surgical therapeutic approaches for cancers, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy and photodynamic therapy, due to their implication in triggering cell death, therefore ROS are also used to kill cancer cells. Because of the double-edged sword property of ROS in determining cell fate, both pro- or anti-oxidant therapies have been proposed for treatments of cancers. Based on either side, a number of drugs, agents and approaches are developed or in the progress of development, some of which have shown clinical promise. This review summarizes the current understanding on ROS-manipulation strategies in cancer treatment and underlying mechanisms. ROS-producing or -eliminating agents and the potential drugs in this aspect are categorized. An effort is made in particular to discuss the paradox in the rationales of two opposite ROS-manipulation strategies and the concerns for their use. Selectivity between tumor and non-tumor cells may depend on difference of their redox environments. A combinational set of cellular parameters including redox status, antioxidant enzymes expression, cell signaling and transcription factor activation profiles, namely "redox signaling signature", is waiting for being developed in order to choose ROS-elevating or ROS-depleting therapy specific to certain type of cancer cells. In clinical setting individualized choice of an optimal ROS-manipulation therapy may require accurate and convenient measurements for ROS as well as "redox signaling signature" for prediction of efficacy and systemic toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18981733     DOI: 10.4161/cbt.7.12.7067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  202 in total

Review 1.  Tumor ablation and nanotechnology.

Authors:  Rachel L Manthe; Susan P Foy; Nishanth Krishnamurthy; Blanka Sharma; Vinod Labhasetwar
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Crosstalk between calcium and reactive oxygen species signaling in cancer.

Authors:  Nadine Hempel; Mohamed Trebak
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.817

3.  Selective induction of tumor cell apoptosis by a novel P450-mediated reactive oxygen species (ROS) inducer methyl 3-(4-nitrophenyl) propiolate.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Sun; Midan Ai; Ying Wang; Shensi Shen; Yuan Gu; Yi Jin; Zuyu Zhou; Yaqiu Long; Qiang Yu
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Systemic delivery of Salmonella typhimurium transformed with IDO shRNA enhances intratumoral vector colonization and suppresses tumor growth.

Authors:  Céline A Blache; Edwin R Manuel; Teodora I Kaltcheva; Andrea N Wong; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; Bruce R Blazar; Don J Diamond
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Combined iron oxide nanoparticle ferumoxytol and gadolinium contrast enhanced MRI define glioblastoma pseudoprogression.

Authors:  Ramon F Barajas; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Daniel Schwartz; Heather L McConnell; David R Pettersson; Andrea Horvath; Laszlo Szidonya; Csanad G Varallyay; Jenny Firkins; Jerry J Jaboin; Charlotte D Kubicky; Ahmed M Raslan; Aclan Dogan; Justin S Cetas; Jeremy Ciporen; Seunggu J Han; Prakash Ambady; Leslie L Muldoon; Randy Woltjer; William D Rooney; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  Effects of sulfonylureas on tumor growth: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Giulia Pasello; Loredana Urso; Pierfranco Conte; Adolfo Favaretto
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-09-16

7.  Chk1 and DNA-PK mediate TPEN-induced DNA damage in a ROS dependent manner in human colon cancer cells.

Authors:  Omar Nasser Rahal; Maamoun Fatfat; Carla Hankache; Bassam Osman; Hala Khalife; Khaled Machaca; Hala-Gali Muhtasib
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.742

8.  The oncogene HER2/neu (ERBB2) requires the hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1 for mammary tumor growth and anoikis resistance.

Authors:  Kelly A Whelan; Luciana P Schwab; Sergey V Karakashev; Lisa Franchetti; Gregg J Johannes; Tiffany N Seagroves; Mauricio J Reginato
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Signaling mechanism(s) of reactive oxygen species in Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition reminiscent of cancer stem cells in tumor progression.

Authors:  Zhiwei Wang; Yiwei Li; Fazlul H Sarkar
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.828

10.  Identification of compound CA-5f as a novel late-stage autophagy inhibitor with potent anti-tumor effect against non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; PengFei Qiang; JingTing Yu; YiMing Miao; ZhiQiang Chen; Ju Qu; QianBing Zhao; Zhuo Chen; Yachao Liu; Xin Yao; Bin Liu; LiuQing Cui; HongJuan Jing; Gangchun Sun
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 16.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.